Recovering Quantum Logic Within an Extended Classical Framework

被引:8
作者
Garola, Claudio [1 ,2 ]
Sozzo, Sandro [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salento, Dipartimento Fis, I-73100 Lecce, Italy
[2] Sezione Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, I-73100 Lecce, Italy
[3] Vrije Univ Brussel, Ctr Leo Apostel CLEA, B-1150 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
HIDDEN-VARIABLES; SEMANTIC REALISM; PARADOXES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10670-011-9353-4
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
We present a procedure which allows us to recover classical and nonclassical logical structures as concrete logics associated with physical theories expressed by means of classical languages. This procedure consists in choosing, for a given theory and classical language expressing an observative sublanguage L of with a notion of truth as correspondence, introducing in L a derived and theory-dependent notion of C-truth (true with certainty), defining a physical preorder induced by C-truth, and finally selecting a set of sentences I center dot (V) that are verifiable (or testable) according to on which a weak complementation (aSyen) is induced by The triple is then the desired concrete logic. By applying this procedure we recover a classical logic and a standard quantum logic as concrete logics associated with classical and quantum mechanics, respectively. The latter result is obtained in a purely formal way, but it can be provided with a physical meaning by adopting a recent interpretation of quantum mechanics that reinterprets quantum probabilities as conditional on detection rather than absolute. Hence quantum logic can be considered as a mathematical structure formalizing the properties of the notion of verification in quantum physics. This conclusion supports the general idea that some nonclassical logics can coexist without conflicting with classical logic (global pluralism) because they formalize metalinguistic notions that do not coincide with the notion of truth as correspondence but are not alternative to it either.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 419
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The ambiguity of simplicity in quantum and classical simulation
    Aghamohammadi, Cina
    Mahoney, John R.
    Crutchfield, James P.
    PHYSICS LETTERS A, 2017, 381 (14) : 1223 - 1227
  • [32] Zwitters: Particles between quantum and classical
    Wetterich, C.
    PHYSICS LETTERS A, 2012, 376 (05) : 706 - 712
  • [33] On quantum vs. classical probability
    Rau, Jochen
    ANNALS OF PHYSICS, 2009, 324 (12) : 2622 - 2637
  • [34] Quantum particles from classical statistics
    Wetterich, C.
    ANNALEN DER PHYSIK, 2010, 522 (11) : 807 - 848
  • [35] Counting Classical Nodes in Quantum Networks
    Lu, He
    Huang, Chien-Ying
    Li, Zheng-Da
    Yin, Xu-Fei
    Zhang, Rui
    Liao, Teh-Lu
    Chen, Yu-Ao
    Li, Che-Ming
    Pan, Jian-Wei
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2020, 124 (18)
  • [36] Semantics of quantum programming languages: Classical control, quantum control
    Valiron, Benoit
    JOURNAL OF LOGICAL AND ALGEBRAIC METHODS IN PROGRAMMING, 2022, 128
  • [37] Exciton quantum dynamics in the molecular logic gates for quantum computing
    Yonetani, Yoshiteru
    CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 570
  • [38] The End of a Classical Ontology for Quantum Mechanics?
    Evans, Peter W.
    ENTROPY, 2021, 23 (01) : 1 - 18
  • [39] Classical and quantum properties of black holes
    Gao SiJie
    Guo MinYong
    Ma YongGe
    Zhang HongBao
    SCIENTIA SINICA-PHYSICA MECHANICA & ASTRONOMICA, 2022, 52 (07)
  • [40] RELAXATION PHENOMENA IN CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM SYSTEMS
    Spagnolo, B.
    Caldara, P.
    La Cognata, A.
    Augello, G.
    Valenti, D.
    Fiasconaro, A.
    Dubkov, A. A.
    Falci, G.
    ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA B, 2012, 43 (05): : 1169 - 1189