Measuring the attractiveness of Dutch landscapes: Identifying national hotspots of highly valued places using Google Maps

被引:55
作者
de Vries, Sjerp [1 ]
Buijs, Arjen E. [2 ]
Langers, Fransje [3 ]
Farjon, Hans [4 ]
van Hinsberg, Arjen [4 ]
Sijtsma, Frans J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Alterra Cultural Geog, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Forest & Nat Policy Alterra, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Alterra, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Environm Assessment Agcy, NL-3720 AH Bilthoven, Netherlands
[5] Univ Groningen, Fac Spatial Sci, NL-9700 AV Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Google Maps; Landscape; Natural places; Social values; Attractiveness; Spatial discounting; MANAGEMENT; ATTRIBUTES; BIODIVERSITY; PREFERENCES; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.017
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
In a Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) or an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), determining the value that the general public attaches to a landscape is often problematic. To aid the inclusion of this social value in such analyses, a Google Maps-based tool, called the HotSpotMonitor (HSM), was developed. The HSM determines which natural places are highly attractive by having people mark such places on a map. The definition of attractiveness remains open to avoid having marker placement being influenced by preconceived thoughts. The number of markers an area receives is considered to indicate its social value. Six regions were selected, and from these, stratified samples were drawn (total n = 3293). Participants placed markers at three spatial levels: local, regional and national. This paper focuses on the markers at the national level. The first research question is whether the HSM can produce an accurate map of highly attractive places at a national level. The results indicated that while in principle HSM can produce such a map, the spatial representativeness of the sample is important. The region of origin of the participants influenced where they placed their markers, an effect previously termed spatial discounting. The second research question considers which qualities the participants associate with the marked places. These qualities were very similar at all three spatial levels: green, natural, presence of water and quiet were often selected out of the fourteen suggested qualities. The third, and more exploratory, research question concerns which characteristics of an area predict its attractiveness. Natural and forest areas had higher marker densities than water surfaces or all other types of land use combined. The discussion evaluates the potential of the HSM to generate input on social landscape values for CBAs and EIAs. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 229
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Social-ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space [J].
Alessa, Lilian ;
Kliskey, Andrew ;
Brown, Gregory .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2008, 85 (01) :27-39
[2]   Why landscapes of the past are important for the future [J].
Antrop, M .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2005, 70 (1-2) :21-34
[3]   Using Google Maps to collect spatial responses in a survey environment [J].
Bearman, Nick ;
Appleton, Katy .
AREA, 2012, 44 (02) :160-169
[4]   A Benefit-Cost Analysis of Private and Semi-Private Hospital Rooms [J].
Boardman, Anthony E. ;
Forbes, Diane .
JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2011, 2 (01)
[5]   Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: Methods and applications [J].
Brown, G .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2005, 18 (01) :17-39
[6]  
Brown G, 2000, FOREST SCI, V46, P240
[7]   The extrapolation of social landscape values to a national level in New Zealand using landscape character classification [J].
Brown, Greg ;
Brabyn, Lars .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 35 (1-2) :84-94
[8]   The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment [J].
Brown, Gregory ;
Raymond, Christopher .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2007, 27 (02) :89-111
[9]   Social Landscape Metrics: Measures for Understanding Place Values from Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS) [J].
Brown, Gregory Gordon ;
Reed, Pat .
LANDSCAPE RESEARCH, 2012, 37 (01) :73-90
[10]   Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: Where, what, and how? [J].
Bryan, Brett A. ;
Raymond, Christopher M. ;
Crossman, Neville D. ;
Macdonald, Darla Hatton .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2010, 97 (02) :111-122