Life cycle assessment of pyrolysis, gasification and incineration waste-to-energy technologies: Theoretical analysis and case study of commercial plants

被引:188
|
作者
Dong, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Yuanjun [1 ,2 ]
Nzihou, Ange [1 ]
Chi, Yong [2 ]
Weiss-Hortala, Elsa [1 ]
Ni, Mingjiang [2 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Mines Albi, Ctr RAPSODEE, Campus Jarlard, F-81013 Albi, France
[2] Zhejiang Univ, State Key Lab Clean Energy Utilizat, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Waste-to-energy technology; Environmental sustainability; Life cycle assessment; Non-toxic and toxic impacts; Large-scale commercial plants; Improvement and impediments; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCES; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; POTENTIAL IMPACT; SYSTEM; COMBUSTION; MSW; PERSPECTIVE; MANAGEMENT; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.151
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Municipal solid waste (MSW) pyrolysis and gasification are in development, stimulated by a more sustainable waste-to-energy (WtE) option. Since comprehensive comparisons of the existing WtE technologies are fairly rare, this study aims to conduct a life cycle assessment (LCA) using two sets of data: theoretical analysis, and case studies of large-scale commercial plants. Seven systems involving thermal conversion (pyrolysis, gasification, incineration) and energy utilization (steam cycle, gas turbine/combined cycle, internal combustion engine) are modeled. Theoretical analysis results show that pyrolysis and gasification, in particular coupled with a gas turbine/combined cycle, have the potential to lessen the environmental loadings. The benefits derive from an improved energy efficiency leading to less fossil-based energy consumption, and the reduced process emissions by syngas combustion. Comparison among the four operating plants (incineration, pyrolysis, gasification, gasification-melting) confirms a preferable performance of the gasification plant attributed to syngas cleaning. The modern incineration is superior over pyrolysis and gasification-melting at present, due to the effectiveness of modern flue gas cleaning, use of combined heat and power (CHP) cycle, and ash recycling. The sensitivity analysis highlights a crucial role of the plant efficiency and pyrolysis char land utilization. The study indicates that the heterogeneity of MSW and syngas purification technologies are the most relevant impediments for the current pyrolysis/gasification-based WtE. Potential development should incorporate into all process aspects to boost the energy efficiency, improve incoming waste quality, and achieve efficient residues management. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:744 / 753
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life cycle assessment of hydrothermal carbonization of municipal solid waste for waste-to-energy generation
    Rahman, Kaniz Fatema
    Abrar, Md Farhatul
    Tithi, Sanjida Safa
    Kabir, Kazi Bayzid
    Kirtania, Kawnish
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 370
  • [22] Life cycle assessment of a pyrolysis/gasification plant for hazardous paint waste
    Saft, Robert Jan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2007, 12 (04) : 230 - 238
  • [23] Use of life cycle assessment for estimating impacts of waste-to-energy technologies in solid waste management systems: the case of Buenos Aires, Argentina
    Silvia Luciana Galván
    Raquel Ofelia Bielsa
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 : 9992 - 10012
  • [24] Life cycle assessment of a pyrolysis/gasification plant for hazardous paint waste
    Robert Jan Saft
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2007, 12 : 230 - 238
  • [25] Life Cycle Assessment of Waste-to-Energy: Energy Recovery from Wood Waste in Malaysia
    Choong, Joo Ee
    Onn, Chiu Chuen
    Yusoff, Sumiani
    Mohd, Nuruol Syuhadaa
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2019, 28 (04): : 2593 - 2602
  • [26] Multi-objective optimization to improve energy, economic and, environmental life cycle assessment in waste-to-energy plant
    Mayanti, Bening
    Songok, Joel
    Helo, Petri
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 127 : 147 - 157
  • [27] A systematic review on life cycle assessment of different waste to energy valorization technologies
    Dastjerdi, Behnam
    Strezov, Vladimir
    Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali
    Kumar, Ravinder
    Behnia, Masud
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 290
  • [28] Contribution to closing the loop on waste materials: valorization of bottom ash from waste-to-energy plants under a life cycle approach
    Margallo, M.
    Aldaco, R.
    Bala, A.
    Fullana, P.
    Irabien, A.
    JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CYCLES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 20 (03) : 1507 - 1515
  • [29] Waste-to-energy generation technologies and the developing economies: A multi-criteria analysis for sustainability assessment
    Khan, Imran
    Kabir, Zobaidul
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 150 : 320 - 333
  • [30] Life cycle assessment of a micro-region Hungarian municipal solid waste: Evaluation of six waste-to-energy scenarios
    Kovacs, Viktoria Barbara
    Hidegh, Gyongyver Tothpalne
    Racz, Erika
    Szucs, Botond
    Csokai, Viktor
    Jozsa, Viktor
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 294