A theorisation of discrete emotion spillovers: an empirical test for anger

被引:18
作者
Antonetti, Paolo [1 ]
Valor, Carmen [2 ]
机构
[1] NEOMA Business Sch, Mkt, Rouen Campus,1 Rue Marechal Juin, F-76130 Mont St Aignan, France
[2] Univ Comillas, ICADE Business Sch, Mkt, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Emotion spillover; appraisal theory; anger; corporate social irresponsibility; crisis communications; scapegoating; CORPORATE SOCIAL IRRESPONSIBILITY; AMAZONS MECHANICAL TURK; CONSUMER ANGER; CRISIS COMMUNICATION; MORAL OUTRAGE; ATTITUDE; CONTAGION; SERVICE; INFORMATION; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1080/0267257X.2020.1817767
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Compared to cognitive and behavioural spillover, emotional spillovers remain relatively undertheorised. This is the first paper to conceptualise discrete emotion spillover. In discrete emotion spillover, the content and valence of an emotion experienced towards target A spills over to target B, and indirectly influences subsequent behaviour towards target B. We test this model in two studies, examining the spillover of anger following corporate social irresponsibility (CSI). First, we show that anger spillover depends on attribution of blame, and leads to emotion-consistent outcomes (i.e. punitive behaviour). Second, we demonstrate the effectiveness of communication strategies that can reduce attribution of blame, thus limiting emotion spillover. We conclude by highlighting the implications of the proposed conceptualisation of discrete emotion spillover in other marketing contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 625
页数:27
相关论文
共 105 条
  • [71] Identifying Careless Responses in Survey Data
    Meade, Adam W.
    Craig, S. Bartholomew
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2012, 17 (03) : 437 - 455
  • [72] Corporate social responsibility and corporate social irresponsibility: Introduction to a special topic section
    Murphy, Patrick E.
    Schlegelmilch, Bodo B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2013, 66 (10) : 1807 - 1813
  • [73] Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power
    Oppenheimer, Daniel M.
    Meyvis, Tom
    Davidenko, Nicolas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 45 (04) : 867 - 872
  • [74] Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a Participant Pool
    Paolacci, Gabriele
    Chandler, Jesse
    [J]. CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 23 (03) : 184 - 188
  • [75] Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk
    Peer, Eyal
    Vosgerau, Joachim
    Acquisti, Alessandro
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2014, 46 (04) : 1023 - 1031
  • [76] Petty R.E., 1986, Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1]
  • [77] Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies
    Podsakoff, PM
    MacKenzie, SB
    Lee, JY
    Podsakoff, NP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (05) : 879 - 903
  • [78] Witnessing Incivility among Employees: Effects on Consumer Anger and Negative Inferences about Companies
    Porath, Christine
    MacInnis, Debbie
    Folkes, Valerie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2010, 37 (02) : 292 - 303
  • [79] Raufeisen X., 2019, AMS Review, V9, P249, DOI DOI 10.1007/S13162-019-00143-X
  • [80] Brands and religious labels: a spillover perspective
    Rauschnabel, Philipp A.
    Herz, Marc
    Schlegelmilch, Bodo B.
    Ivens, Bjoern S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2015, 31 (11-12) : 1285 - 1309