Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry

被引:174
作者
Anojkumar, L. [1 ]
Ilangkumaran, M. [1 ]
Sasirekha, V. [2 ]
机构
[1] KS Rangasamy Coll Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Namakkal 637215, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] KS Rangasamy Coll Engn, Dept Comp Applicat, Namakkal 637215, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
FAHP; TOPSIS; VIKOR; ELECTRE; PROMETHEE; Material selection; Corrosion; Wear; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEM; VIKOR METHOD; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; COMPROMISE RANKING; TOPSIS METHOD; DESIGN; AHP; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2013.10.028
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The material plays an important role in an engineering design process. The suitable material selection for a particular product is one of the vital tasks for the designers. In order to fulfil the product's end requirements, designers need to analyze the performance of various materials and spot suitable materials with precise functionalities. Due to the presence of large number of materials with diverse properties, the material selection process is complicated and time consuming task. There is a necessity of systematic and efficient approach towards material selection to choose best alternative material for a product. The aim of this paper is to describe the application of four Multi Criteria Decision Making methods for solving pipes material selection problem in sugar industry. FAHP-TOPSIS, FAHP-VIKOR, FAHP-ELECTRE, FAHP-PROMTHEE are the four methods used to choose the best alternative among the various materials. The ranking performance of various MCDM methods is also compared with each other and exploring the effectiveness and flexibility of VIKOR method. Five stainless steel grades such as J4, JSLAUS, J204Cu, 409 M, 304 and seven evaluation criteria such as yield strength, ultimate tensile strength, percentage of elongation, hardness, cost, corrosion rate and wear rate are focussed in this study to choose the suitable material. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2964 / 2980
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Supplier selection for an industry using MCDM techniques [J].
Kumar Behera D. ;
Beura S. .
Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023, 74 :901-909
[22]   Polymeric Materials Selection for Flexible Pulsating Heat Pipe Manufacturing Using a Comparative Hybrid MCDM Approach [J].
Ordu, Muhammed ;
Der, Oguzhan .
POLYMERS, 2023, 15 (13)
[23]   Supplier selection in supply chain network using MCDM methods [J].
Evcioglu, Hamdi Efe ;
Kabak, Mehmet .
SIGMA JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND NATURAL SCIENCES-SIGMA MUHENDISLIK VE FEN BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2023, 41 (01) :1-16
[24]   Penstock material selection in small hydropower plants using MADM methods [J].
Kumar, Ravi ;
Singal, S. K. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 52 :240-255
[25]   Comparative MCDM Analysis for AMD Treatment Method Selection [J].
Stirbanovic, Zoran ;
Gardic, Vojka ;
Stanujkic, Dragisa ;
Markovic, Radmila ;
Sokolovic, Jovica ;
Stevanovic, Zoran .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2021, 35 (11) :3737-3753
[26]   Decision making model for material selection using a hybrid MCDM technique [J].
Jajimoggala, S. (sarojini.jaji@gmail.com), 1600, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd., 29, route de Pre-Bois, Case Postale 856, CH-1215 Geneva 15, CH-1215, Switzerland (06) :144-159
[27]   Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for Product Aspect Ranking: TOPSIS and VIKOR [J].
Alrababah, Saif A. Ahmad ;
Gan, Keng Hoon ;
Tan, Tien-Ping .
2017 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (ICICS), 2017, :76-81
[28]   APPLICATION OF MCDM/MCDA METHODS IN CITY RANKINGS REVIEW AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS [J].
Ogrodnik, Karolina .
ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 86 (03) :132-151
[29]   Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan [J].
Lee, Hsing-Chen ;
Chang, Ching-Ter .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 92 :883-896
[30]   Comparative analysis on washability indices of anthracite coal by using MCDM methods [J].
Sokolovic, Jovica ;
Stanujki, Dragisa ;
Stirbanovi, Zoran ;
Ilic, Ivana .
PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROBLEMS OF MINERAL PROCESSING, 2025, 61 (01)