Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry

被引:175
作者
Anojkumar, L. [1 ]
Ilangkumaran, M. [1 ]
Sasirekha, V. [2 ]
机构
[1] KS Rangasamy Coll Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Namakkal 637215, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] KS Rangasamy Coll Engn, Dept Comp Applicat, Namakkal 637215, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
FAHP; TOPSIS; VIKOR; ELECTRE; PROMETHEE; Material selection; Corrosion; Wear; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEM; VIKOR METHOD; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; COMPROMISE RANKING; TOPSIS METHOD; DESIGN; AHP; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2013.10.028
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The material plays an important role in an engineering design process. The suitable material selection for a particular product is one of the vital tasks for the designers. In order to fulfil the product's end requirements, designers need to analyze the performance of various materials and spot suitable materials with precise functionalities. Due to the presence of large number of materials with diverse properties, the material selection process is complicated and time consuming task. There is a necessity of systematic and efficient approach towards material selection to choose best alternative material for a product. The aim of this paper is to describe the application of four Multi Criteria Decision Making methods for solving pipes material selection problem in sugar industry. FAHP-TOPSIS, FAHP-VIKOR, FAHP-ELECTRE, FAHP-PROMTHEE are the four methods used to choose the best alternative among the various materials. The ranking performance of various MCDM methods is also compared with each other and exploring the effectiveness and flexibility of VIKOR method. Five stainless steel grades such as J4, JSLAUS, J204Cu, 409 M, 304 and seven evaluation criteria such as yield strength, ultimate tensile strength, percentage of elongation, hardness, cost, corrosion rate and wear rate are focussed in this study to choose the suitable material. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2964 / 2980
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Green material selection for sustainability: A hybrid MCDM approach [J].
Zhang, Honghao ;
Peng, Yong ;
Tian, Guangdong ;
Wang, Danqi ;
Xie, Pengpeng .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (05)
[12]   Business Intelligence System Selection with Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic MCDM Methods [J].
Buyukozkan, Gulcin ;
Mukul, Esin ;
Guler, Merve .
2019 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA SCIENCE AND BUSINESS ANALYTICS (ICDSBA 2019), 2019, :141-146
[13]   Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome [J].
Wojciech Sałabun ;
Andrzej Piegat .
Artificial Intelligence Review, 2017, 48 :557-571
[14]   Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome [J].
Salabun, Wojciech ;
Piegat, Andrzej .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2017, 48 (04) :557-571
[15]   Selection of a Communication Satellite Manufacturer using MCDM methods [J].
Kahriman, A. ;
Oztokatli, M. ;
Das, G. Sena .
2015 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RECENT ADVANCES IN SPACE TECHNOLOGIES (RAST), 2015, :347-351
[16]   Selection of Wearable Technologies for Obesity Patients with MCDM Methods [J].
Akinci, Beyza Nur ;
Danisan, Tugba ;
Eren, Tamer .
JOURNAL OF POLYTECHNIC-POLITEKNIK DERGISI, 2022, 25 (03) :947-957
[17]   AN APPROACH WEB SERVICE SELECTION BY QUALITY CRITERIA BASED ON SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF MCDM METHODS [J].
Polska, O., V ;
Kudermetov, R. K. ;
Shkarupylo, V. V. .
RADIO ELECTRONICS COMPUTER SCIENCE CONTROL, 2021, (02) :133-143
[18]   Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS [J].
Opricovic, S ;
Tzeng, GH .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 156 (02) :445-455
[19]   COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PROMETHEE AND FUZZY PROMETHEE METHODS IN EQUIPMENT SELECTION PROBLEM [J].
Yilmaz, Burcu ;
Dagdeviren, Metin .
JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE OF GAZI UNIVERSITY, 2010, 25 (04) :811-826
[20]   Supplier selection for an industry using MCDM techniques [J].
Kumar Behera D. ;
Beura S. .
Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023, 74 :901-909