Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry

被引:171
|
作者
Anojkumar, L. [1 ]
Ilangkumaran, M. [1 ]
Sasirekha, V. [2 ]
机构
[1] KS Rangasamy Coll Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Namakkal 637215, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] KS Rangasamy Coll Engn, Dept Comp Applicat, Namakkal 637215, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
FAHP; TOPSIS; VIKOR; ELECTRE; PROMETHEE; Material selection; Corrosion; Wear; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEM; VIKOR METHOD; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; COMPROMISE RANKING; TOPSIS METHOD; DESIGN; AHP; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2013.10.028
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The material plays an important role in an engineering design process. The suitable material selection for a particular product is one of the vital tasks for the designers. In order to fulfil the product's end requirements, designers need to analyze the performance of various materials and spot suitable materials with precise functionalities. Due to the presence of large number of materials with diverse properties, the material selection process is complicated and time consuming task. There is a necessity of systematic and efficient approach towards material selection to choose best alternative material for a product. The aim of this paper is to describe the application of four Multi Criteria Decision Making methods for solving pipes material selection problem in sugar industry. FAHP-TOPSIS, FAHP-VIKOR, FAHP-ELECTRE, FAHP-PROMTHEE are the four methods used to choose the best alternative among the various materials. The ranking performance of various MCDM methods is also compared with each other and exploring the effectiveness and flexibility of VIKOR method. Five stainless steel grades such as J4, JSLAUS, J204Cu, 409 M, 304 and seven evaluation criteria such as yield strength, ultimate tensile strength, percentage of elongation, hardness, cost, corrosion rate and wear rate are focussed in this study to choose the suitable material. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2964 / 2980
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative analysis of hybrid MCDM methods in material selection for dental applications
    Bhaskar, Akula Siva
    Khan, Akhtar
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 209
  • [2] A decision making methodology for material selection in sugar industry using hybrid MCDM techniques
    Anojkumar, L.
    Ilangkumaran, M.
    Vignesh, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATERIALS & PRODUCT TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 51 (02): : 102 - 126
  • [3] MCDM approach for selection of raw material in pulp and papermaking industry
    Singh, Meenu
    Pant, Millie
    Godiyal, R. D.
    Kumar Sharma, Arvind
    MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2020, 35 (03) : 241 - 249
  • [4] Intelligent Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods for Material Selection in Sugar Industry
    Darji, V. P.
    Rao, R. V.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING (ICAMME 2014), 2014, 5 : 2585 - 2594
  • [5] Supplier selection for aerospace & defense industry through MCDM methods
    Rasmussen, Aksel
    Sabic, Haris
    Saha, Subrata
    Nielsen, Izabela Ewa
    CLEANER ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 12
  • [6] Comparative MCDM Analysis for AMD Treatment Method Selection
    Stirbanovic, Zoran
    Gardic, Vojka
    Stanujkic, Dragisa
    Markovic, Radmila
    Sokolovic, Jovica
    Stevanovic, Zoran
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2021, 35 (11) : 3737 - 3753
  • [7] Comparative MCDM Analysis for AMD Treatment Method Selection
    Zoran Štirbanović
    Vojka Gardić
    Dragiša Stanujkić
    Radmila Marković
    Jovica Sokolović
    Zoran Stevanović
    Water Resources Management, 2021, 35 : 3737 - 3753
  • [8] Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS
    Opricovic, S
    Tzeng, GH
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 156 (02) : 445 - 455
  • [9] A comparative analysis of prominently used MCDM methods in cloud environment
    Major Singh Neeraj
    Damanpreet Goraya
    The Journal of Supercomputing, 2021, 77 : 3422 - 3449
  • [10] A comparative analysis of prominently used MCDM methods in cloud environment
    Neeraj
    Goraya, Major Singh
    Singh, Damanpreet
    JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTING, 2021, 77 (04): : 3422 - 3449