Is Kant's Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Fit for Purpose?

被引：22
作者：
Gomes, Anil [1 ]
机构：
[1] Birkbeck Coll, London, England
来源：
KANTIAN REVIEW | 2010年 / 15卷 / 02期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1017/S1369415400002466
中图分类号：
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号：
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要：
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页码：118 / 137
页数：20
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Where have all the categories gone? Reflections on Longuenesse's reading of Kant's transcendental deduction [J].
Allison, HE .
INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2000, 43 (01) :67-80
[2]  
Allison Henry E, 2004, KANTS TRANSCENDENTAL, VRevised and enlarged
[3]  
Ameriks K., 2003, RECENT WORK KANTS TH
[4]  
Ameriks Karl., 2000, Kant and the Fate of Autonomy: Problems in the Appropriation of the Critical Philosophy
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1992, CAMBRIDGE COMPANION
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Critique of Pure Reason
[7]   TRANSCENDENTAL ARGUMENTS, TRANSCENDENTAL SYNTHESIS AND TRANSCENDENTAL IDEALISM [J].
CASSAM, Q .
PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 1987, 37 (149) :355-378
[8]  
HENRICH D, 1969, REV METAPHYS, V22, P640
[9]  
Henrich Dieter., 1994, The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant's Philosophy
[10]   Kant's categories and the capacity to judge: Responses to Henry Allison and Sally Sedgwick [J].
Longuenesse, B .
INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2000, 43 (01) :91-110
12