Defining past ecological status and in situ reference conditions using benthic foraminifera: A case study from the Oslofjord, Norway

被引:75
作者
Dolven, Jane K. [1 ]
Alve, Elisabeth [1 ]
Rygg, Brage [2 ]
Magnusson, Jan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Dept Geosci, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[2] Norwegian Inst Water Res NIVA, N-0349 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Environmental monitoring; In situ reference conditions; Biological quality element; Conservation Paleobiology; European Water Framework Directive; Ecological Quality Status (EcoQS); GULLMAR FJORD; OXYGEN CONCENTRATIONS; RECORD; EUTROPHICATION; POLLUTION; RECONSTRUCTION; ENVIRONMENTS; SWEDEN; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.031
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Characterizing marine water bodies and defining ecological status, both present and past (pre-impacted), has become an important task for EU's Member States and their associates during the last decade due to the implementation of the Water Framework Directive (WFD). However, none of the methods used to define Ecological Quality Status (EcoQS) are able to accurately define the status for both the present-day and reference conditions at a given site (i.e., in situ). Recent studies have revealed a significant correlation between the diversity of living (stained) fossilizable benthic foraminifera (protists) and associated environmental parameters (e.g., dissolved oxygen concentration). The present study takes this relationship a step further by applying methods used to define present-day EcoQS on fossil benthic foraminiferal assemblages and, thereby, defining past EcoQS (PaleoEcoQS). This is particularly useful for defining reference condition in areas where biological- and instrumental time-series are limited or lacking. Our case study from the Oslofjord, Norway, shows that (1) the "Foraminiferal method" can define temporal developments in in situ EcoQS from reference to present-day conditions, (2) results of the "Foraminiferal method" reflect available historical biological records and hydrographic time series, (3) data (1993 and 2009) on macrofauna (traditional bin-monitoring tool) and benthic foraminifera from the same sites define the same EcoQS, and (4) the changes in foraminiferal diversity through time are due to human activity (pollution), rather than climate change. Using in situ data to define ecological reference conditions is preferable compared to modeling or comparisons with present-day supposedly similar reference conditions. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 233
页数:15
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   BENTHIC FORAMINIFERAL DISTRIBUTION AND RECOLONIZATION OF FORMERLY ANOXIC ENVIRONMENTS IN DRAMMENSFJORD, SOUTHERN NORWAY [J].
ALVE, E .
MARINE MICROPALEONTOLOGY, 1995, 25 (2-3) :169-186
[3]  
Alve E., 1991, Holocene, V1, P243, DOI 10.1177/095968369100100306
[4]   Monitoring strategies for re-establishment of ecological reference conditions: Possibilities and limitations [J].
Alve, Elisabeth ;
Lepland, Aivo ;
Magnusson, Jan ;
Backer-Owe, Kristian .
MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2009, 59 (8-12) :297-310
[5]   Palaeoecology, reference conditions and classification of ecological status: the EU Water Framework Directive in practice [J].
Andersen, JH ;
Conley, DJ ;
Hedal, S .
MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2004, 49 (04) :283-290
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Primer
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1994, 4470 NORSK
[8]  
Appleby PG, 2002, DEV PALEOENVIRON RES, V1, P171
[9]  
Arnesen V, 2001, AMBIO, V30, P282, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2001)030[0282:TPAPOT]2.0.CO
[10]  
2