Pharmacokinetic comparison of a fixed-dose combination versus concomitant administration of amlodipine, olmesartan, and rosuvastatin in healthy adult subjects

被引:7
作者
Oh, Minkyung [1 ,2 ]
Shin, Jae-Gook [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ahn, Sangzin [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Bo Hoon [4 ]
Kim, Ji Yeon [4 ]
Shin, Hyun Ju [5 ]
Ghim, Jong-Lyul [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Inje Univ, Dept Pharmacol, Coll Med, Busan, South Korea
[2] Inje Univ, PharmacoGen Res Ctr, Coll Med, Busan, South Korea
[3] Inje Univ, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Busan Paik Hosp, Busan, South Korea
[4] Daewoong Pharma, Formulat Res Team, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Daewoong Pharma, Clin Res Team, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
fixed-dose combination; pharmacokinetics; amlodipine; olmesartan; rosuvastatin; BLOOD-PRESSURE; OPEN-LABEL; BIOEQUIVALENCE; MEDOXOMIL; BESYLATE;
D O I
10.2147/DDDT.S202730
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of a fixed dose combination (FDC) formulation and co-administration of amlodipine, olmesartan, and rosuvastatin. Materials and methods: This study was an open-label, randomized, cross-over design conducted in healthy male volunteers. All subjects received either a single FDC tablet containing amlodipine 10 mg/olmesartan 40 mg/rosuvastatin 20 mg, or were co-administered an FDC tablet containing amlodipine 10 mg/olmesartan 40 mg and a tablet containing rosuvastatin 20 mg, for each period, with 14-day washout periods. Plasma concentrations of amlodipine, olmesartan, and rosuvastatin were measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Safety was evaluated by measuring vital signs, clinical laboratory parameters, physical examinations, and medical interviews. Results: Sixty-four subjects were enrolled, and 54 completed the study. The geometric mean ratios and 90% CI for the maximum plasma concentration (C-max) and area under the curve from time zero to the last sampling time (AUC(t)) were 1.0716 (1.0369,1.1074) and 1.0497 (1.0243,1.0757) for amlodipine, 1.0396 (0.9818,1.1009) and 1.0138 (0.9716,1.0578) for olmesartan, and 1.0257 (0.9433,1.1152) and 1.0043 (0.9453,1.0669) for rosuvastatin. Fourteen cases of adverse events occurred in 12 subjects. There was no statistically significant clinical difference between the formulation groups. Conclusion: The 90% CI of the primary PK parameters were within the acceptance bioequivalence criteria, which is ln (0.8) and ln (1.25). These results indicate that the FDC formulation and co-administration of amlodipine, olmesartan and rosuvastatin are pharmacokinetically bioequivalent and have similar safety profiles.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 997
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], STAT 8 KOREA YOUTH R
[2]  
[Anonymous], STAT 5 KOR NAT HLTH
[3]  
[Anonymous], STATICS DEATHS 2013
[4]   Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure [J].
Chobanian, AV ;
Bakris, GL ;
Black, HR ;
Cushman, WC ;
Green, LA ;
Izzo, JL ;
Jones, DW ;
Materson, BJ ;
Oparil, S ;
Wright, JT ;
Roccella, EJ .
HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (06) :1206-1252
[5]  
Dezii C M, 2000, Manag Care, V9, P2
[6]   Amlodipine/Valsartan Single-Pill Combination A Review of its Use in the Management of Hypertension [J].
Frampton, James E. ;
Scott, Lesley J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS, 2009, 9 (05) :309-330
[7]  
Jackson R, 2005, LANCET, V365, P434, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17833-7
[8]  
Johnson Michael L., 2004, Heart Dis, V2, P3
[9]   Bioequivalence evaluation of two amlodipine salts, besylate and orotate, each in a fixed-dose combination with olmesartan in healthy subjects [J].
Lee, Soo-Yun ;
Kim, Jung-Ryul ;
Jung, Jin Ah ;
Huh, Wooseong ;
Bahng, Mi Young ;
Ko, Jae-Wook .
DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2015, 9 :2811-2817
[10]  
Lewington S, 2002, LANCET, V360, P1903, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11911-8