Biologically effective dose values for prostate brachytherapy: Effects on PSA failure and posttreatment biopsy results

被引:213
作者
Stock, RG
Stone, NN
Cesaretti, JA
Rosenstein, BS
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10029 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2006年 / 64卷 / 02期
关键词
prostate cancer; Brachytherapy; biologically effective dose;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.07.981
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To analyze the effect of biologically effective dose (BED) values on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure and posttreatment biopsy. Methods and Materials: From 1990 to 2003, 1,377 patients had prostate brachytherapy alone (I-125 or Pd-103) (571), hormonal and brachytherapy (371), and trimodality therapy (hormonal, implant, and external beam) (435). Dose was defined as the D90 (dose delivered to 90% of the gland from the dose-volume histogram). Results: Freedom from PSA failure (FFPF) at 10 years was 87%. The 10-year FFPF for BED <100, >100-120, >120-140, >140-160, <160-180, >180-200, and >200 were 46%, 68%, 81%, 85.5%, 90%, 90%, and 92%, respectively (p < 0.0001). BED and Gleason score had the greatest effect, with p values of p < 0.0001 in multivariate analysis. Posttreatment positive biopsy rate was 7% (31/446). The positive biopsy rates for BED <= 100, >100-120, >120-140, >140-160, >160-180, >180-200, and >200 were 24% (8/33), 15% (3/20), 6% (2/33), 6% (3/52), 7% (6/82),1% (1/72), and 3% (4/131), respectively (p < 0.0001). BED was the most significant predictor of biopsy outcome in multivariate analysis (p = 0.006). Conclusions: Biologically effective dose equations provide a method of comparing different isotopes and combined therapies in the brachytherapy management of prostate cancer. The effects of BED on FFPF and posttreatment biopsy demonstrate a strong dose-response relationship. (C) 2006 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 533
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, SPSS 10 0 GUIDE DATA
[2]   DOSE FRACTIONATION, DOSE-RATE AND ISO-EFFECT RELATIONSHIPS FOR NORMAL TISSUE RESPONSES [J].
BARENDSEN, GW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1982, 8 (11) :1981-1997
[3]  
Brenner DJ, 2002, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V52, P6
[4]   Hypofractionation for prostate cancer radiotherapy - What are the issues? [J].
Brenner, DJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 57 (04) :912-914
[5]   Fractionation and protraction for radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Hall, EJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 43 (05) :1095-1101
[6]  
Cox JD, 1997, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V37, P1035
[8]  
FLEMING ID, 1997, AJCC 1992 STAGING SY
[9]   Is α/β for prostate tumors really low? [J].
Fowler, J ;
Chappell, R ;
Ritter, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 50 (04) :1021-1031
[10]   What hypofractionated protocols should be tested for prostate cancer? [J].
Fowler, JF ;
Ritter, MA ;
Chappell, RJ ;
Brenner, DJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (04) :1093-1104