Surgical and oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in an Asian population

被引:8
|
作者
Ng, Yvonne Ying-Ru [1 ]
Tan, Veronique Kiak-Mien [2 ]
Pek, Wan Sze [3 ]
Chang, Jasmine Hui-Er [1 ]
Sim, Yirong [2 ]
Ong, Kong Wee [2 ]
Yong, Wei Sean [2 ]
Madhukumar, Preetha [2 ]
Wong, Chow Yin [1 ]
Ong, Yee Siang [3 ]
Tan, Bien Keem [3 ]
Tan, Benita Kiat Tee [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Canc Ctr Singapore, Div Surg Oncol, 11 Hosp Dr, Singapore 169610, Singapore
[3] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Nipple-sparing mastectomy; Immediate breast reconstruction; Asian; AREOLA COMPLEX; POSTMASTECTOMY RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; TRENDS; CHEMOTHERAPY; ANGIOGRAPHY; INVOLVEMENT; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s12282-018-0908-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) allows for excellent postmastectomy reconstruction aesthetics and is used for both therapeutic and risk-reducing purposes. Reservations regarding the potential for locoregional recurrence and concerns about nipple-areolar complex (NAC) necrosis remain amongst many surgeons. We review the surgical and oncological outcomes after NSM in our institution. Methods All NSM cases at the National Cancer Centre Singapore and Singapore General Hospital between 2005 and 2015 were reviewed. Tumour characteristics, reconstruction methods, surgical and oncological outcomes are described. Results A total of 139 NSMs were performed for 130 patients. The median age was 46 years (range 21-66). The use of NSM increased from 2% of all breast reconstructions in 2005 to 37% in 2015. The majority (n = 119; 86%) were for cancer treatment and 20 (14%) for risk-reducing purposes. Among those performed for cancer, patients mainly had early stage breast cancer (n = 106, 89%). Autologous reconstruction (n = 111, 80%) was most common. Early complications requiring surgical intervention occurred in 24 (17%) NSMs, including 9 partial/complete flap loss and 2 complete NAC loss. Smoking, previous breast radiation and periareolar incision were all not associated with a higher re-intervention rate (p = 0.93, 0.41 and 0.91, respectively). Median follow-up was 43 months (range 5-145). Five patients (4%) developed local recurrence, including 2 NAC recurrences. The 2- and 5-year overall survival rate is 97 and 90%, respectively. Conclusion NSM is an oncologically safe procedure in selected patients with acceptable low complication rates .
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 171
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surgical and oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in an Asian population
    Yvonne Ying-Ru Ng
    Veronique Kiak-Mien Tan
    Wan Sze Pek
    Jasmine Hui-Er Chang
    Yirong Sim
    Kong Wee Ong
    Wei Sean Yong
    Preetha Madhukumar
    Chow Yin Wong
    Yee Siang Ong
    Bien Keem Tan
    Benita Kiat Tee Tan
    Breast Cancer, 2019, 26 : 165 - 171
  • [2] Advances in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Oncological Safety and Incision Selection
    Maxwell, G. Patrick
    Storm-Dickerson, Toni
    Whitworth, Pat
    Rubano, Christopher
    Gabriel, Allen
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2011, 31 (03) : 310 - 319
  • [3] The oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy - A Swedish matched cohort study
    Adam, H.
    Bygdeson, M.
    de Boniface, J.
    EJSO, 2014, 40 (10): : 1209 - 1215
  • [4] Nipple-sparing mastectomy: indications, oncologic safety
    Ananthakrishnan, P.
    Feldman, S.
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2012, 67 (03) : 257 - 270
  • [5] Nipple Loss following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Mastroianni, Melissa
    Lin, Alex M.
    Smith, Barbara L.
    Austen, William G., Jr.
    Colwell, Amy S.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 138 (01) : 24E - 30E
  • [6] The modern approach to the nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Kopkash, Katherine
    Sisco, Mark
    Poli, Elizabeth
    Seth, Akhil
    Pesce, Catherine
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 122 (01) : 29 - 35
  • [7] Oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in young patients with breast cancer compared with conventional mastectomy
    Huang, Jiapeng
    Mo, Qinguo
    Zhuang, Yaqiang
    Qin, Qinghong
    Huang, Zhen
    Mo, Junyang
    Tan, Qixing
    Lian, Bin
    Cao, Yiming
    Qin, Shuting
    Wei, Changyuan
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 15 (04) : 4813 - 4820
  • [8] Oncological and Surgical Outcomes After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Do Incisions Matter?
    Donovan, Cory A.
    Harit, Attiya P.
    Chung, Alice
    Bao, Jean
    Giuliano, Armando E.
    Amersi, Farin
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (10) : 3226 - 3231
  • [9] Oncological safety of therapeutic 'nipple-sparing mastectomy' followed by reconstruction: a systematic review
    Blanckaert, Maxim
    Vranckx, Jan
    ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA, 2021, 121 (03) : 155 - 163
  • [10] Oncological safety of nipple-sparing prophylactic mastectomy: A review of the literature on 3716 cases
    Muller, T.
    Baratte, A.
    Bruant-Rodier, C.
    Bodin, F.
    Mathelin, C.
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE PLASTIQUE ESTHETIQUE, 2018, 63 (03): : E6 - E13