Multi-component interventions and change in screening rates in primary care clinics in the Colorectal Cancer Control Program

被引:2
|
作者
Sharma, Krishna P. [1 ]
DeGroff, Amy [1 ]
Hohl, Sarah D. [2 ]
Maxwell, Annette E. [3 ,4 ]
Escoffery, Ngoc Cam [5 ]
Sabatino, Susan A. [1 ]
Joseph, Djenaba A. [1 ]
机构
[1] CDC, Div Canc Prevent & Control, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv, Hlth Promot Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Ctr Canc Prevent & Control Res, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[5] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, CDC, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
Colorectal cancer screening; Preventive Health; Evidence-based interventions; Multicomponent interventions; Primary care clinics; DISPARITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101904
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been shown to decrease CRC mortality. Implementation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) increases CRC screening. The purpose of this analysis is to determine which combinations of EBIs or strategies led to increases in clinic-level screening rates among clinics participating in CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP). Data were collected from CRCCP clinics between 2015 and 2018 and the analysis was conducted in 2020. The outcome variable was the annual change in clinic level CRC screening rate in percentage points. We used first difference (FD) estimator of linear panel data regression model to estimate the associations of outcome with independent variables, which include different combinations of EBIs and intervention strategies. The study sample included 486 unique clinics with 1156 clinic years of total observations. The average baseline screening rate was 41 % with average annual increase of 4.6 percentage points. Only two out of six combinations of any two EBIs were associated with increases in screening rate (largest was 6.5 percentage points, P < 0.001). Any combinations involving three EBIs or all four EBIs were significantly associated with the outcome with largest increase of 7.2 percentage points (P < 0.001). All interventions involving 2-3 strategies led to increases in rate with largest increase associated with the combination of increasing community demand and access (6.1 percentage points, P < 0.001). Clinics implementing combinations of these EBIs, particularly those including three or more EBIs, often were more likely to have impact on screening rate change than those implementing none.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Multilevel Approach to Understand the Context and Potential Solutions for Low Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Rates in Rural Appalachia Clinics
    Zoellner, Jamie
    Porter, Kathleen
    Thatcher, Esther
    Kennedy, Erin
    Werth, James L., Jr.
    Grossman, Betsy
    Roatsey, Tomas
    Hamilton, Heather
    Anderson, Roger
    Cohn, Wendy
    JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2021, 37 (03) : 585 - 601
  • [32] Preferences for colorectal cancer screening among racially/ethnically diverse primary care patients
    Hawley, Sarah T.
    Volk, Robert J.
    Krishnamurthy, Partha
    Jibaja-Weiss, Maria
    Vernon, Sally W.
    Kneuper, Suzanne
    MEDICAL CARE, 2008, 46 (09) : S10 - S16
  • [33] Colorectal Cancer Screening Practices of Primary Care Providers: Results of a National Survey in Malaysia
    Norwati, Daud
    Harmy, Mohamed Yusoff
    Norhayati, Mohd Noor
    Amry, Abdul Rahim
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (06) : 2901 - 2904
  • [34] Effectiveness of a primary care practice intervention for increasing colorectal cancer screening in Appalachian Kentucky
    Dignan, Mark
    Shelton, Brent
    Slone, Stacey A.
    Tolle, Cheri
    Mohammad, Sohail
    Schoenberg, Nancy
    Pearce, Kevin
    Van Meter, Emily
    Ely, Gretchen
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 58 : 70 - 74
  • [35] Examining the Sustainability of Core Capacity and Evidence-Based Interventions for FIT-Based CRC Screening: California Colorectal Cancer Control Program
    Omelu, Ndukaku
    Kempster, Marilyn
    Velasquez, Leeann
    de Ybarra, Jessica Nunez
    Littaua, Renato
    Davis-Patterson, Shauntay
    Coelho, Marco
    Darsie, Brendan
    Hunter, June
    Donahue, Celena
    Carrillo, Socorro
    Arias, Raquel
    Pinal, Sonia
    CANCER CONTROL, 2024, 31
  • [36] Testing behavioral interventions to optimize participation in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program in Catalonia, Spain
    Stoffel, S.
    Benito, L.
    Mila, N.
    Travier, N.
    Binefa, G.
    Vidal, C.
    Espinosa, J.
    Moreno, V
    Garcia, M.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 119 : 58 - 62
  • [37] Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural and Urban Primary Care Practices Amid Implementation of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act
    Borders, Tyrone F.
    Morgan, Zachary J.
    Peterson, Lars E.
    JOURNAL OF PRIMARY CARE AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2023, 14
  • [38] Addressing the cervical cancer burden in the Rio Grande Valley of Texas through a multi-component program to improve screening and diagnostic follow-up: A retrospective cohort study
    Varon, Melissa Lopez
    Salcedo, Mila Pontremoli
    Fellman, Bryan
    Troisi, Catherine
    Gowen, Rose
    Daheri, Maria
    Rodriguez, Ana M.
    Toscano, Paul
    Guerra, Laura
    Gasca, Monica
    Cavazos, Blanca
    Marin, Elena
    Fisher-Hoch, Susan
    Fernandez, Maria E.
    Reininger, Belinda
    Li, Ruosha
    Baker, Ellen
    Schmeler, Kathleen
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2025, 95
  • [39] Knowledge, Experiences, and Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Survey of Health Care Providers Working in Primary Care Settings
    Suha Omran
    Husam Barakat
    Joshua Kanaabi Muliira
    Nabeela Aljadaa
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2015, 30 : 53 - 61
  • [40] Knowledge, Experiences, and Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Survey of Health Care Providers Working in Primary Care Settings
    Omran, Suha
    Barakat, Husam
    Muliira, Joshua Kanaabi
    Aljadaa, Nabeela
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2015, 30 (01) : 53 - 61