The revision of the European blood directives: A major challenge for transfusion medicine

被引:16
作者
Follea, G. [1 ]
Aranko, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] European Blood Alliance, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Blood; Blood components; Blood transfusion; Blood products; EU blood directives; Public healthcare; Transfusion medicine; DONORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.tracli.2015.05.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim. - Using both patient-focused and donor-focused perspectives, to review the current EU blood directives, in order to derive proposals, in principle, for what should evolve during the revision process of these directives. Methods. - Review of the EU blood directives in the light of scientific literature, related reports from the Directorate General Health and Consumers (DG SANTE), and from the Council of Europe (CoE). Results. - The analyses led us to present the main following proposals: developing voluntary unpaid donations: the directives should consider taking into consideration ethically acceptable forms of compensation consistent with altruistic donation (including plasma donations for fractionation); current expertise: more extensive utilization of the expertise of blood establishments and their consultants should be considered; donor selection: an evidence-based approach for basing donor deferral criteria on sound scientific evidence should be promoted; donor reactions: measures to prevent donor reactions and to make donations safer for the donors should also be included; quality control: The quality control requirements should relate to the Council of Europe Blood Guide specifications: these should become minimum standards (as is the case with monographs of the European Pharmacopeia), facilitating regular update of blood component lists and related specifications and compliance with the specifications; haemovigilance: because of reporting difficulties (e.g. lack of number of blood products transfused), the effectiveness of haemovigilance has so far been limited. This should lead appropriate bodies to investigate alternative or complementary ways to help improve patient safety, taking into consideration, in principle, patient blood management and the appropriate use of blood products. Furthermore, donor vigilance, which is still absent from the current directive should be included in a revised directive. Conclusions. - These proposals for revising the current EU blood directives (if taken into account and given appropriate regulatory formulation) should help to optimize patient safety and donor care, progress the compliance with the ethical principles for donors and improve the efficiency of the healthcare systems dedicated to transfusion medicine. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 147
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, TREATY ESTABLISHING
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, HUM BOD DON MED RES
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, EU WIDE OVERVIEW MAR
[4]  
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, 2000, OFFICIAL J EUROPEAN, V2000/C 364/01
[5]  
Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, 2013, RES SEX BEH BLOOD DO
[6]  
De Kort W, BLOOD DONOR SE UNPUB
[7]  
Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare of the Council of Europe (EDQM), 2013, GUIDE PREPARATION US, V17th, P255
[8]  
Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare of the Council of Europe (EDQM), 2013, GUIDE PREPARATION US, V17th, P75
[9]   Improving Safety for Young Blood Donors [J].
Eder, Anne F. .
TRANSFUSION MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2012, 26 (01) :14-26
[10]  
European Commission, 2008, RUL GOV MED PROD EUR, V4