A Meta-Analysis of Lesser Prairie-Chicken Nesting and Brood-Rearing Habitats: Implications for Habitat Management

被引:34
作者
Hagen, Christian A. [1 ]
Grisham, Blake A. [2 ]
Boal, Clint W. [3 ]
Haukos, David A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife, Bend, OR 97702 USA
[2] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Nat Resources Management, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[3] Texas Tech Univ, US Geol Survey, Texas Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[4] Kansas State Univ, US Geol Survey, Kansas Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Manhattan, KS 66502 USA
来源
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN | 2013年 / 37卷 / 04期
关键词
Artemisia filifolia; breeding habitat; Conservation Reserve Program; effect size; Hedges' d; lesser prairie-chicken; Quercus havardii; sand sagebrush; sand shinnery oak; Tympanuchus pallidicinctus;
D O I
10.1002/wsb.313
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The distribution and range of lesser prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) has been reduced by >90% since European settlement of the Great Plains of North America. Currently, lesser prairie-chickens occupy 3 general vegetation communities: sand sagebrush (Artemisia filifolia), sand shinnery oak (Quercus havardii), and mixed-grass prairies juxtaposed with Conservation Reserve Program grasslands. As a candidate for protection under the Endangered Species Act, there is a need for a synthesis that characterizes habitat structure rangewide. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis of vegetation characteristics at nest sites and brood habitats to determine whether there was an overall effect (Hedges' d) of habitat selection and to estimate average (95% CI) habitat characteristics at use sites. We estimated effect sizes (d(i)) from the difference between use (nests and brood sites) and random sampling sites for each study (n = 14), and derived an overall effect size (d(++)). There was a general effect for habitat selection as evidenced by low levels of variation in effect sizes across studies and regions. There was a small to medium effect (d(++) = 0.20-0.82) of selection for greater vertical structure (visual obstruction) by nesting females in both vegetation communities, and selection against bare ground (d(++) = 0.20-0.58). Females with broods exhibited less selectivity for habitat components except for vertical structure. The variation of d(++) was greater during nesting than brooding periods, signifying a seasonal shift in habitat use, and perhaps a greater range of tolerance for brood-rearing habitat. The overall estimates of vegetation cover were consistent with those provided in management guidelines for the species. (C) Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
引用
收藏
页码:750 / 758
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[21]  
Hall J.A., 1994, HDB RES SYNTHESIS, P17
[22]  
HAUKOS DA, 1989, GREAT BASIN NAT, V49, P624
[23]  
Hedges L. V., 2014, Statistical methods for metaanalysis
[24]   ESTIMATION OF EFFECT SIZE FROM A SERIES OF INDEPENDENT EXPERIMENTS [J].
HEDGES, LV .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1982, 92 (02) :490-499
[25]  
Jamison B.E., 2002, Effects of management practices on grassland birds: lesser prairie-chicken, p29 pag
[26]  
Jamison BE, 2002, WILDLIFE SOC B, V30, P517
[27]  
Jones R. E., 1963, Journal of Wildlife Management, V27, P757, DOI 10.2307/3798492
[28]  
Lyons EK, 2011, STUD AVIAN BIOL, P223
[29]  
Patten MA, 2005, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V69, P1270, DOI 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[1270:EOMAMS]2.0.CO
[30]  
2