A Meta-Analysis of Lesser Prairie-Chicken Nesting and Brood-Rearing Habitats: Implications for Habitat Management

被引:34
作者
Hagen, Christian A. [1 ]
Grisham, Blake A. [2 ]
Boal, Clint W. [3 ]
Haukos, David A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife, Bend, OR 97702 USA
[2] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Nat Resources Management, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[3] Texas Tech Univ, US Geol Survey, Texas Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[4] Kansas State Univ, US Geol Survey, Kansas Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Manhattan, KS 66502 USA
来源
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN | 2013年 / 37卷 / 04期
关键词
Artemisia filifolia; breeding habitat; Conservation Reserve Program; effect size; Hedges' d; lesser prairie-chicken; Quercus havardii; sand sagebrush; sand shinnery oak; Tympanuchus pallidicinctus;
D O I
10.1002/wsb.313
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The distribution and range of lesser prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) has been reduced by >90% since European settlement of the Great Plains of North America. Currently, lesser prairie-chickens occupy 3 general vegetation communities: sand sagebrush (Artemisia filifolia), sand shinnery oak (Quercus havardii), and mixed-grass prairies juxtaposed with Conservation Reserve Program grasslands. As a candidate for protection under the Endangered Species Act, there is a need for a synthesis that characterizes habitat structure rangewide. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis of vegetation characteristics at nest sites and brood habitats to determine whether there was an overall effect (Hedges' d) of habitat selection and to estimate average (95% CI) habitat characteristics at use sites. We estimated effect sizes (d(i)) from the difference between use (nests and brood sites) and random sampling sites for each study (n = 14), and derived an overall effect size (d(++)). There was a general effect for habitat selection as evidenced by low levels of variation in effect sizes across studies and regions. There was a small to medium effect (d(++) = 0.20-0.82) of selection for greater vertical structure (visual obstruction) by nesting females in both vegetation communities, and selection against bare ground (d(++) = 0.20-0.58). Females with broods exhibited less selectivity for habitat components except for vertical structure. The variation of d(++) was greater during nesting than brooding periods, signifying a seasonal shift in habitat use, and perhaps a greater range of tolerance for brood-rearing habitat. The overall estimates of vegetation cover were consistent with those provided in management guidelines for the species. (C) Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
引用
收藏
页码:750 / 758
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Lesser Prairie-Chicken Hen and Brood Habitat Use on Sand Shinnery Oak [J].
Bell, Luke A. ;
Fuhlendorf, Samuel D. ;
Patten, Michael A. ;
Wolfe, Donald H. ;
Sherrod, Steve K. .
RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2010, 63 (04) :478-486
[2]  
COHEN J., 1969, Statistical power analysis
[3]  
Davis C.A., 1979, Habitat evaluation of lesser prairie chickens in eastern Chaves County, New Mexico
[4]  
Davis D.M., 2008, Lesser prairie-chicken conservation initiative
[5]   NESTING ECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS OF LESSER PRAIRIE-CHICKENS IN SHINNERY OAK-DOMINATED RANGELANDS [J].
Davis, Dawn M. .
WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY, 2009, 121 (02) :322-327
[6]  
Elson M, 2000, MOVEMENTS HABITAT SE
[7]  
FIELDS TL, 2004, THESIS COLORADO STAT
[8]   MOVEMENTS AND NESTING HABITAT OF LESSER PRAIRIE-CHICKEN HENS IN COLORADO [J].
GIESEN, KM .
SOUTHWESTERN NATURALIST, 1994, 39 (01) :96-98
[9]  
Grisham B. A., 2012, THESIS TEXAS TU LUBB
[10]   Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses [J].
Gurevitch, J ;
Hedges, LV .
ECOLOGY, 1999, 80 (04) :1142-1149