Outcomes 'Out of Africa': the selection and implementation of outcome measures for palliative care in Africa

被引:23
作者
Downing, Julia [1 ,2 ]
Simon, Steffen T. [3 ,4 ]
Mwangi-Powell, Faith N. [5 ]
Benalia, Hamid [6 ]
Daveson, Barbara A. [6 ]
Higginson, Irene J. [6 ]
Harding, Richard [6 ]
Bausewein, Claudia [6 ]
机构
[1] Makerere Univ, Kampala, Uganda
[2] African Palliat Care Assoc, Kampala, Uganda
[3] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Palliat Med, D-50924 Cologne, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Cologne, Clin Trials Unit BMBF 01KN1106, D-50924 Cologne, Germany
[5] African Palliat Care Assoc, Kampala, Uganda
[6] Kings Coll London, Dept Palliat Care Policy & Rehabil, Cicely Saunders Inst, London SE5 9PJ, England
来源
BMC PALLIATIVE CARE | 2012年 / 11卷
关键词
Palliative care; Online survey; Outcomes; Outcome measurement; Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS); APCA African POS; Research; Africa; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CANCER; ADVANCE;
D O I
10.1186/1472-684X-11-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: End-of-life care research across Africa is under-resourced and under-developed. A central issue in research in end-of-life care is the measurement of effects and outcomes of care on patients and families. Little is known about the experiences of health professionals' selection and implementation of outcome measures (OM) in clinical care, research, audit, or teaching in Africa. Methods: An online survey was undertaken of those using outcome measures across the region, as part of the PRISMA project. A questionnaire addressing the use of OMs was developed for a similar survey in Europe and adapted for Africa. Participants were sampled through the contacts database of APCA. Invitation emails were sent out in January 2010 and reminders in February 2010. Results: 168/301 invited contacts (56%) from 24 countries responded, with 78 respondents having previously used OM (65% in clinical practice, 12% in research and 23% for both). Main reasons for not using OM were a lack of guidance/training on using and analysing OM, with 49% saying that they would use the tools if this was provided. 40% of those using OM in clinical practice used POS, and 80% used them to assess, evaluate and monitor change. The POS was also the main tool used in research, with the principle criteria for use being validation in Africa, access to the tool and time needed to complete it. Challenges to the use of tools were shortage of time and resources, lack of guidance and training for the professionals, poor health status of patients and complexity of OM. Researchers also have problems analysing OM data. The APCA African POS was the most common version of the POS used, and was reported as a valuable tool for measuring outcomes. Respondents indicated the ideal outcome tool should be short, multi-dimensional and easy to use. Conclusion: This was the first survey on professionals' views on OM in Africa. It showed that the APCA African POS was the most frequently OM used. Training and support are needed to help professionals utilise OM in palliative care, and OMs have an ongoing and important role in palliative care in Africa.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Evaluation of quality-of-life measures for use in palliative care: a systematic review
    Albers, Gwenda
    Echteld, Michael A.
    de Vet, Henrica C. W.
    Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D.
    van der Linden, Mecheline H. M.
    Deliens, Luc
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 24 (01) : 17 - 37
  • [2] [Anonymous], REP NAM PALL CAR SIT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, PROGR PALLIATIVE CAR, V14, P215
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1992, MEASURES NEED OUTCOM
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2011, World health statistics 2011
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1980, EXPLORATIONS QUALITY
  • [7] [Anonymous], GLOBOCAN 2008 - Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide in 2008
  • [8] Bausewein C, 2011, PALLIAT MED
  • [9] Implementing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in palliative care - users' cry for help
    Bausewein, Claudia
    Simon, Steffen T.
    Benalia, Hamid
    Downing, Julia
    Mwangi-Powell, Faith N.
    Daveson, Barbara A.
    Harding, Richard
    Higginson, Irene J.
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2011, 9
  • [10] Bowling A, 1994, MEASURING DIS