Constrained ordinal optimization - A feasibility model based approach

被引:16
作者
Guan, Xiaohong [1 ]
Song, Chen
Ho, Yu-Chi
Zhao, Qianchuan
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, SKLMS Lab & Syst Engn Inst, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Ctr Intelligent & Networked Syst, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Harvard Univ, Div Engn & Appl Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
来源
DISCRETE EVENT DYNAMIC SYSTEMS-THEORY AND APPLICATIONS | 2006年 / 16卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ordinal optimization; simulation-based optimization; constrained ordinal optimization; subset selection; alignment probability;
D O I
10.1007/s10626-006-8137-5
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Ordinal Optimization (OO) is a useful simulation-based approach for stochastic optimization problems such as the problems in Discrete Event Dynamic Systems (DEDS). However, OO cannot be applied directly for the problem since many infeasible decisions cannot be excluded from ordinal comparison without extensive computation involving the expectation operation. In this paper, a new approach for solving constrained ordinal optimization (COO) problems is presented. The key idea of our method for constrained OO problems is to estimate the feasibility of decisions and to choose selected subset based on the estimated feasibility. Any crude method such as the one based on rough set theory developed in our previous work can be applied to determine the decision feasibility efficiently. The algorithm for subset selection and the procedure of Blind Picking with Feasibility Model (BPFM) for COO are derived in the paper. The infeasible decisions are excluded by an imperfect feasibility model in the procedure of subset selection. The performance of the new method is evaluated and compared with the regular OO method. Numerical testing with two examples including the planning problem of a practical remanufacturing system shows that to meet the same required alignment probability, BPFM is more efficient than pure Blind Picking in regular OO.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 299
页数:21
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Cassandras Christos., 1993, Discrete Event Systems: Modeling and Performance Analysis
[2]   Optimal computing budget allocation for Monte Carlo simulation with application to product design [J].
Chen, CH ;
Donohue, K ;
Yücesan, E ;
Lin, JW .
SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY, 2003, 11 (01) :57-74
[3]   Convergence properties of ordinal comparison in the simulation of discrete event dynamic systems [J].
Dai, L .
JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1996, 91 (02) :363-388
[4]   Optimization for simulation: Theory vs. practice [J].
Fu, MC .
INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2002, 14 (03) :192-215
[5]  
HAN J, 2002, DATA MINING CONCEPTS, pCH3
[6]  
Ho Y.-C., 1992, Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, V2, P61
[7]   The no free lunch theorems: Complexity and security [J].
Ho, YC ;
Zhao, QC ;
Pepyne, DL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2003, 48 (05) :783-793
[8]   An explanation of ordinal optimization: Soft computing for hard problems [J].
Ho, YC .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 1999, 113 (3-4) :169-192
[9]  
HO YC, 1994, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P1975, DOI 10.1109/CDC.1994.411087
[10]  
JIA QS, 2005, J MATH COMPUTER MODE