Dopamine Alters the Fidelity of Working Memory Representations according to Attentional Demands

被引:19
|
作者
Fallon, Sean James [1 ]
Zokaei, Nahid [1 ]
Norbury, Agnes [2 ]
Manohar, Sanjay G. [1 ,3 ]
Husain, Masud [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge, England
[3] John Radcliffe Hosp, Oxford, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PARKINSONS-DISEASE; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; FRONTAL-CORTEX; MODULATION; PREDICTS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; OSCILLATIONS; FLEXIBILITY;
D O I
10.1162/jocn_a_01073
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Capacity limitations in working memory (WM) necessitate the need to effectively control its contents. Here, we examined the effect of cabergoline, a dopamine D-2 receptor agonist, on WM using a continuous report paradigm that allowed us to assess the fidelity with which items are stored. We assessed recall performance under three different gating conditions: remembering only one item, being cued to remember one target among distractors, and having to remember all items. Cabergoline had differential effects on recall performance according to whether distractors had to be ignored and whether mnemonic resources could be deployed exclusively to the target. Compared with placebo, cabergoline improved mnemonic performance when there were no distractors but significantly reduced performance when distractors were presented in a precue condition. No significant difference in performance was observed under cabergoline when all items had to be remembered. By applying a stochasticmodel of response selection, we established that the causes of drug-induced changes in performance were due to changes in the precision with which items were stored in WM. However, there was no change in the extent to which distractors were mistaken for targets. Thus, D2 agonism causes changes in the fidelity of mnemonic representations without altering interference between memoranda.
引用
收藏
页码:728 / 738
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Attentional Templates in Visual Working Memory
    Carlisle, Nancy B.
    Arita, Jason T.
    Pardo, Deborah
    Woodman, Geoffrey F.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 31 (25) : 9315 - 9322
  • [32] The Effect of Dopamine on Working Memory
    Liang, Lina
    Wang, Rubin
    Zhang, Zhikang
    NEURAL PROCESSING LETTERS, 2012, 35 (03) : 257 - 263
  • [33] An attentional and working memory theory of hallucination vulnerability in frontotemporal dementia
    Devenney, Emma M.
    Tse, Nga Yan
    O'Callaghan, Claire
    Kumfor, Fiona
    Ahmed, Rebekah M.
    Caga, Jashelle
    Hazelton, Jessica L.
    Carrick, James
    Halliday, Glenda M.
    Piguet, Olivier
    Kiernan, Matthew C.
    Hodges, John R.
    BRAIN COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 6 (03)
  • [34] How low can you go? Changing the resolution of novel complex objects in visual working memory according to task demands
    Allon, Ayala S.
    Balaban, Halely
    Luria, Roy
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [35] The Comparison of Visual Working Memory Representations With Perceptual Inputs
    Hyun, Joo-Seok
    Woodman, Geoffrey F.
    Vogel, Edward K.
    Hollingworth, Andrew
    Luck, Steven J.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2009, 35 (04) : 1140 - 1160
  • [36] A Neural Network Model of Episode Representations in Working Memory
    Takac, Martin
    Knott, Alistair
    COGNITIVE COMPUTATION, 2015, 7 (05) : 509 - 525
  • [37] Attentional Orienting in Working Memory in Children with ADHD
    Superbia-Guimaraes, Luisa
    Bader, Michel
    Camos, Valerie
    DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 47 (08) : 384 - 400
  • [38] On the difference between working memory and attentional set
    Olivers, Christian N. L.
    Eimer, Martin
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2011, 49 (06) : 1553 - 1558
  • [39] Visual Working Memory and Attentional Object Selection
    Eimer, Martin
    MECHANISMS OF SENSORY WORKING MEMORY: ATTENTION AND PERFOMANCE XXV, 2016, : 89 - 104
  • [40] Attentional priority determines working memory precision
    Klyszejko, Zuzanna
    Rahmati, Masih
    Curtis, Clayton E.
    VISION RESEARCH, 2014, 105 : 70 - 76