Extracting accurate strain measurements in bone mechanics: A critical review of current methods

被引:73
作者
Grassi, Lorenzo [1 ]
Isaksson, Hanna
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Lund, Sweden
关键词
Strain; Femur; Validation; Strain gauges; Strain gages; Fibre Bragg grating; Digital image correlation; Digital volume correlation; DIGITAL VOLUME CORRELATION; FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS; IN-VITRO; TRABECULAR BONE; FEMUR; DEFORMATION; VALIDATION; INSERTION; BEHAVIOR; FRACTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.006
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Osteoporosis related fractures are a social burden that advocates for more accurate fracture prediction methods. Mechanistic methods, e.g. finite element models, have been proposed as a tool to better predict bone mechanical behaviour and strength. However, there is little consensus about the optimal constitutive law to describe bone as a material. Extracting reliable and relevant strain data from experimental tests is of fundamental importance to better understand bone mechanical properties, and to validate numerical models. Several techniques have been used to measure strain in experimental mechanics, with substantial differences in terms of accuracy, precision, time- and length-scale. Each technique presents upsides and downsides that must be carefully evaluated when designing the experiment. Moreover, additional complexities are often encountered when applying such strain measurement techniques to bone, due to its complex composite structure. This review of literature examined the four most commonly adopted methods for strain measurements (strain gauges, fibre Bragg grating sensors, digital image correlation, and digital volume correlation), with a focus on studies with bone as a substrate material, at the organ and tissue level. For each of them the working principles, a summary of the main applications to bone mechanics at the organ- and tissue-level, and a list of pros and cons are provided. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 54
页数:12
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] Changes in proximal femoral strain after insertion of uncemented standard and customised femoral stems
    Aamodt, A
    Lund-Larsen, J
    Eine, J
    Andersen, E
    Benum, P
    Husby, OS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2001, 83B (06): : 921 - 929
  • [2] Ajovalasit A., 2010, EPJ WEB C, P6
  • [3] Assessment of Digital Image Correlation Measurement Accuracy in the Ultimate Error Regime: Main Results of a Collaborative Benchmark
    Amiot, F.
    Bornert, M.
    Doumalin, P.
    Dupre, J. -C.
    Fazzini, M.
    Orteu, J. -J.
    Poilane, C.
    Robert, L.
    Rotinat, R.
    Toussaint, E.
    Wattrisse, B.
    Wienin, J. S.
    [J]. STRAIN, 2013, 49 (06) : 483 - 496
  • [4] An YH., 1999, MECH TESTING BONE BO
  • [5] Anderson Andrew E., 2007, Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, V10, P171, DOI 10.1080/10255840601160484
  • [6] Barber D. C., 2005, Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, V29, P53, DOI 10.1080/03091900412331289889
  • [7] A biomechanical comparison of composite femurs and cadaver femurs used in experiments on operated hip fractures
    Basso, Trude
    Klaksvik, Jomar
    Syversen, Unni
    Foss, Olav A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2014, 47 (16) : 3898 - 3902
  • [8] Digital volume correlation: Three-dimensional strain mapping using X-ray tomography
    Bay, BK
    Smith, TS
    Fyhrie, DP
    Saad, M
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS, 1999, 39 (03) : 217 - 226
  • [9] NUMERICAL-ANALYSIS OF THE REINFORCEMENT EFFECT OF A STRAIN-GAUGE APPLIED TO A SOFT MATERIAL
    BEATTY, MF
    CHEWNING, SW
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1979, 17 (07) : 907 - 915
  • [10] Bedzinski R., 2000, ACTA BIOENG BIOMECH, V2, P3