Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma

被引:1341
作者
O'Reilly, Charles A., III [1 ]
Tushman, Michael L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Business, Boston, MA 02163 USA
来源
RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 28: AN ANNUAL SERIES OF ANALYTICAL ESSAYS AND CRITICAL REVIEWS | 2008年 / 28卷
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
How do organizations survive in the face of change? Underlying this question is a rich debate about whether organizations can adapt-and if so how. One perspective, organizational ecology, presents evidence Suggesting that most organizations are largely inert and ultimately fail. A second perspective argues that some firms do learn and adapt to shifting environmental contexts. Recently, this latter view has coalesced around two themes. The first, based on research in strategy suggests that dynamic capabilities, the ability of a firm to reconfigure assets and existing capabilities, explains long-term competitive advantage. The second. based on organizational design, armies that ambidexterity, the ability of a firm to Simultaneously explore and exploit. enables a firm to adapt over time. In this paper, we review and integrate these comparatively new research streams and identify a set of propositions that suggest how ambidexterity acts as a dynamic capability. We suggest that efficiency and innovation need not be strategic tradeoffs and highlight the substantive role of senior teams in building dynamic capabilities. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 206
页数:22
相关论文
共 147 条
[1]   Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system [J].
Adler, PS ;
Goldoftas, B ;
Levine, DI .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (01) :43-68
[2]   Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities [J].
Adner, R ;
Helfat, CE .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (10) :1011-1025
[3]  
Albert S., 1985, Research in organizational behavior, P263, DOI DOI 10.1177/1059601112473815
[4]   RESETTING THE CLOCK - THE DYNAMICS OF ORGANIZATIONAL-CHANGE AND FAILURE [J].
AMBURGEY, TL ;
KELLY, D ;
BARNETT, WP .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1993, 38 (01) :51-73
[5]  
Anand J, 1997, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V18, P99, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<99::AID-SMJ928>3.3.CO
[6]  
2-2
[7]  
[Anonymous], LEARNING HETEROGENEO
[8]  
[Anonymous], COMPANION ORG
[9]   The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change [J].
Audia, PG ;
Locke, EA ;
Smith, KG .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (05) :837-853
[10]   AN EVOLUTIONARY MODEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE [J].
BARNETT, WP ;
GREVE, HR ;
PARK, DY .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1994, 15 :11-28