High frequency of p16 and SOX10 coexpression but not androgen receptor expression in triple-negative breast cancers

被引:12
作者
Yoon, Esther C. [1 ]
Wilson, Parker [2 ]
Zuo, Tao [3 ]
Pinto, Marguerite [4 ]
Cole, Kimberly [4 ]
Harigopal, Malini [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Pathol & Immunol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Dept Pathol, Sch Med New Haven, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
Breast Cancer; Triple negative breast cancer; p16; SOX10; AR; Basal-like breast cancer; Biomarkers; BASAL-LIKE SUBTYPE; MOLECULAR PORTRAITS; GENE-EXPRESSION; CARCINOMA; TUMORS; OVEREXPRESSION; RETINOBLASTOMA; BIOMARKERS; PROTEIN; MARKER;
D O I
10.1016/j.humpath.2020.06.004
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) represent approximately 12-17% of all breast cancers and have distinctively aggressive clinical courses. Because routine biomarkers for breast cancer do not apply for TNBCs, it is essential to find novel prognostic markers and potential targets for therapeutic agents. p16 and SOX10 are emerging biomarkers with relatively unexplored expressions in TNBCs. We present an analysis of the expression of p16 and SOX10 in combination with that of androgen receptor (AR) and cytokeratin (CK) 5/6 in TNBCs. In addition, we used tissue microarrays (TMAs) to compare frequencies of p16 and SOX10 between TNBCs and non-TNBCs. Fifty-six TNBC samples with clinical data were stained immunohistochemically with p16, SOX10, AR, and CK5/6. Fifty-four cases (96.4%) were invasive ductal carcinoma, not otherwise specified, and 46 cases (82.1%) were Nottingham histologic grade 3. The majority of TNBC cases were positive for p16 (n = 44; 78.6%) and SOX10 (n = 48; 85.7%). AR was positive in 15 cases (26.8%). CK5/6 was positive in 24 cases (42.9%), which were classified as basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) subtype. The frequencies of p16 and SOX10 expression in BLBC and non-BLBC subtypes did not reveal significant statistical difference in a separate analysis. Using archived TNBC and non-TNBC TMAs, we observed that 56% of TNBC cases were positive for p16 compared with 16% of non-TNBC cases (p-value <0.0001). SOX10 was positive in 80% of TNBC cases compared with 35% of non-TNBC cases (p-value <0.0001). A significant correlation was observed between p16 and SOX10 coexpression in TNBC cases (n = 56/80, p = 0.02) but not in non-TNBC cases (n = 23/348; p = 0.626). In conclusion, p16 and SOX10 are frequently expressed in TNBC, regardless of CK5/6 expression. Furthermore, p16 and SOX10 are often coexpressed in TNBCs compared with non-TNBCs. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 22
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinicopathological significance of Sox10 expression in triple-negative breast carcinoma
    Jin, Linfang
    Qin, Chenglin
    Qi, Xiaowei
    Hong, Tingting
    Yang, Xiaodong
    Zhu, Xun
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (09) : 5603 - 5613
  • [2] SOX10, GATA3, GCDFP15, Androgen Receptor, and Mammaglobin for the Differential Diagnosis Between Triple-negative Breast Cancer and TTF1-negative Lung Adenocarcinoma
    Laurent, Elodie
    Begueret, Hugues
    Bonhomme, Benjamin
    Veillon, Remi
    Thumerel, Matthieu
    Velasco, Valerie
    Brouste, Veronique
    Hoppe, Stephanie
    Fournier, Marion
    Grellety, Thomas
    MacGrogan, Gaetan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2019, 43 (03) : 293 - 302
  • [3] Androgen receptor expression is a favorable prognostic factor in triple-negative breast cancers
    Zuo, Tao
    Wilson, Parker
    Cicek, Ali Fuat
    Harigopal, Malini
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2018, 80 : 239 - 245
  • [4] Targeting the androgen receptor in triple-negative breast cancer: current perspectives
    Mina, Alain
    Yoder, Rachel
    Sharma, Priyanka
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2017, 10 : 4675 - 4685
  • [5] Immunohistochemical Pro fi le of Triple-Negative Breast Cancers: SOX10 and AR Dual Negative Tumors Have Worse Outcomes
    Rammal, Rayan
    Goel, Kanika
    Motanagh, Samaneh A.
    Carter, Gloria J.
    Clark, Beth Z.
    Fine, Jeffrey L.
    Harinath, Lakshmi
    Villatoro, Tatiana M.
    Yu, Jing
    Bhargava, Rohit
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2024, 37 (07)
  • [6] Imaging features of triple-negative breast cancers according to androgen receptor status
    Candelaria, Rosalind P.
    Adrada, Beatriz E.
    Wei, Wei
    Thompson, Alastair M.
    Santiago, Lumarie
    Lane, Deanna L.
    Huang, Monica L.
    Arribas, Elsa M.
    Rauch, Gaiane M.
    Symmans, W. Fraser
    Gilcrease, Michael Z.
    Huo, Lei
    Lim, Bora
    Ueno, Naoto T.
    Moulder, Stacy L.
    Yang, Wei Tse
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 114 : 167 - 174
  • [7] Sry-related high-mobility-group/HMG box 10 (SOX10) as a sensitive marker for triple-negative breast cancer
    Jamidi, Shirley K.
    Hu, Jintao
    Aphivatanasiri, Chaiwat
    Tsang, Julia Y.
    Poon, Ivan K.
    Li, Joshua J.
    Chan, Siu-Ki
    Cheung, Sai-Yin
    Tse, Gary M.
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2020, 77 (06) : 936 - 948
  • [8] Clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and molecular correlation of neural crest transcription factor SOX10 expression in triple-negative breast carcinoma
    Harbhajanka, Aparna
    Chahar, Satyapal
    Miskimen, Kristy
    Silverman, Paula
    Harris, Lyndsay
    Williams, Nicole
    Varadan, Vinay
    Gilmore, Hannah
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2018, 80 : 163 - 169
  • [9] Coexpression of androgen receptor and FOXA1 in nonmetastatic triple-negative breast cancer: ancillary study from PACS08 trial
    Guiu, Severine
    Charon-Barra, Celine
    Vernerey, Dewi
    Fumoleau, Pierre
    Campone, Mario
    Spielmann, Marc
    Roche, Henri
    Mesleard, Christel
    Arnould, Laurent
    Lemonnier, Jerome
    Lacroix-Triki, Magali
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2015, 11 (16) : 2283 - 2297
  • [10] P16 but not retinoblastoma expression is related to clinical outcome in no-special-type triple-negative breast carcinomas
    Bogina, Giuseppe S.
    Lunardi, Gianluigi
    Marcolini, Lisa
    Brunelli, Matte
    Bortesi, Laura
    Marconi, Marcella
    Coati, Francesca
    Valerio, Matteo
    Guerriero, Massimo
    Massocco, Alberto
    Pegoraro, Maria C.
    Zamboni, Giuseppe
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2014, 27 (02) : 204 - 213