A neutral cross efficiency approach for basic two stage production systems

被引:43
作者
Orkcu, H. Hasan [1 ]
Ozsoy, Volkan Soner [1 ]
Orkcu, Mediha [2 ]
Bal, Hasan [1 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Dept Stat, TR-06500 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Gazi Univ, Dept Math, TR-06500 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Cross efficiency; Two-stage DEA; Neutral secondary goal; Geometric average; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; WEIGHT DETERMINATION; DEA; RANKING; DISCRIMINATION; DECOMPOSITION; MODELS; GOAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.067
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Cross efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis (DEA) is an effective tool for ranking the performance of decision-making units (DMUs). Numerous cross efficiency evaluations have been proposed with different secondary goals using both peer-evaluation and self-evaluation. The neutral cross efficiency evaluation is an important secondary goal in the classical black-boxes DEA models; that is, the internal processes of the DMUs are often ignored in the efficiency evaluation. This study extends the idea of neutral cross evaluation to measure the efficiency of the basic two stage network systems and proposes a new neutral cross efficiency model. The proposed model is able to rank DMUs in sub-stages and decompose the cross efficiency measure of the system into the product of those of the stages. The results from two real-world examples show that the neutral cross efficiency model proposed in this paper can increase the discriminating power of a two-stage system and their sub-stages and can obtain more realistic weight scheme than basic two stage DEA model. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 344
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Ranking ranges in cross-efficiency evaluations [J].
Alcaraz, Javier ;
Ramon, Nuria ;
Ruiz, Jose L. ;
Sirvent, Inmaculada .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2013, 226 (03) :516-521
[2]   The fixed weighting nature of a cross-evaluation model [J].
Anderson, TR ;
Hollingsworth, K ;
Inman, L .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2002, 17 (03) :249-255
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1986, NEW DIRECTIONS PROG, DOI DOI 10.1002/EV.1441
[4]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[5]  
Charnes A, 1962, NAV RES LOG, V10, P273
[6]   Optimizing the rank position of the DMU as secondary goal in DEA cross-evaluation [J].
Contreras, I. .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2012, 36 (06) :2642-2648
[7]   EFFICIENCY AND CROSS-EFFICIENCY IN DEA - DERIVATIONS, MEANINGS AND USES [J].
DOYLE, J ;
GREEN, R .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1994, 45 (05) :567-578
[8]  
DOYLE JR, 1995, INFOR, V33, P205
[9]   Selecting symmetric weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation [J].
Jahanshahloo, G. R. ;
Lotfi, F. Hosseinzadeh ;
Jafari, Y. ;
Maddahi, R. .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2011, 35 (01) :544-549
[10]   Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan [J].
Kao, Chiang ;
Hwang, Shiuh-Nan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 185 (01) :418-429