A techno-economic and environmental assessment of long-term energy policies and climate variability impact on the energy system

被引:20
作者
Emodi, Nnaemeka Vincent [1 ]
Chaiechi, Taha [1 ]
Beg, A. B. M. Rabiul Alam [2 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ, Coll Business Law & Governance, Div Trop Environm & Soc, Econ & Mkt Acad Grp, POB 6811, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia
[2] James Cook Univ, Coll Business Law & Governance, Div Trop Environm & Soc, Dept Econ, POB 6811, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
关键词
Climate variability and change; Australia; LEAP; Energy policies; Emission reduction; Scenario analysis; POWER-GENERATION SYSTEM; EUROPEAN WIND ENERGY; ELECTRICITY SYSTEMS; MODEL APPLICATION; SCENARIOS; DEMAND; VULNERABILITY; ALTERNATIVES; PERFORMANCE; PATHWAYS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the impact of climate variability and change (CV&C), and energy policies on the future energy system in Australia. Scenarios were developed to represent CV&C impacts and policy options, which were analysed with the Long-range Energy Alternative and Planning system for the period 2010-2050. The results indicate that although energy demand is likely to increase threefold in the business-as-usual scenario, CV&C further increases demand to 150 petajoule. A combined policy option involving modal shift and penetration of electric and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles results in a 49-53% decrease in transport fuel demand and emissions. The economic analysis reveals a substantial decline in sales revenue and increase in generation costs due to CV&C impacts. Higher renewable energy integration results in lower wholesale electricity prices across independent electricity markets. Cumulative cost-benefit analysis indicates that economic benefits increase to US$4.9 trillion in an advanced renewable energy scenario. Emissions and energy consumed increased under climatic conditions, but decreased after policy intervention. Ignoring the influence of CV&C may result in underestimation of future energy demand and installed capacity in Australia. Therefore, energy and climate policies should consider long-term economic benefits over short-term system costs.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 346
页数:18
相关论文
共 92 条
[51]   Long-term scenario alternatives and their implications: LEAP model application of Panama's electricity sector [J].
McPherson, Madeleine ;
Karney, Bryan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 68 :146-157
[52]  
Merchant E. F, 2018, IRENA GLOBAL RENEWAB
[53]   The Costs of Climate Change for the European Energy System, an Assessment with the POLES Model [J].
Mima, Silvana ;
Criqui, Patrick .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (04) :303-319
[54]   Impacts and Uncertainty of Climate Change on Water Resource Management of the Peribonka River System (Canada) [J].
Minville, Marie ;
Brissette, Francois ;
Leconte, Robert .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 136 (03) :376-385
[55]  
Moksnes N., 2015, 2015 OSeMOSYS User Manual
[56]  
Nadia S. O, 2017, MODELING SUSTAINABLE
[57]  
Nuccitelli D., 2018, The Guardian
[58]  
Operator A.E.M, 2016, NAT TRANSM NETW DEV
[59]  
Operator A.E.M, 2016, NAT GAS FOR REP E S
[60]  
Operator A.E.M, 2015, EM TECHN INF PAP NAT