Economic integration agreements, border effects, and distance elasticities in the gravity equation

被引:202
作者
Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. [1 ,2 ]
Larch, Mario [3 ,4 ]
Yotov, Yoto V. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Econ, Dept Finance, Kellogg Inst Int Studies, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] CESifo, Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Bayreuth, Chair Empir Econ, CESifo, Ifo Inst, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany
[4] Univ Nottingham, GEP, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany
[5] Drexel Univ, LeBow Coll Business, Sch Econ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Bulgarian Acad Sci, Econ Res Inst, Sofia, Bulgaria
关键词
International trade; Economic integration agreements; Gravity equations; TRADE; MODELS; HETEROGENEITY; MARGINS; ACCESS; PUZZLE; EXPORT; ENTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.06.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using a novel common econometric specification, we examine the measurement of three important effects in international trade that historically have been addressed largely separately: the (partial) effects on trade of economic integration agreements, international borders, and bilateral distance. First, recent studies focusing on precise and unbiased estimates of effects of economic integration agreements (EIAs) on members' trade may be biased upward owing to inadequate control for time-varying exogenous unobservable country-pair-specific changes in bilateral export costs (possibly decreasing the costs of international relative to intranational trade); we find evidence of this bias using a properly specified gravity equation. Second, our novel methodology yields statistically significant estimates of the declining effect of "international borders" on world trade, now accounting for endogenous EIA formations and unobserved country-pair heterogeneity in initial levels. Third, we confirm recent evidence providing a solution to the "distance-elasticity puzzle," but show that these estimates of the declining effect of distance on international trade are biased upward by not accounting for endogenous EIA formations and unobserved country-pair heterogeneity. We conclude our study with numerical general equilibrium comparative statics illustrating a substantive difference on trade effects of EIAs with and without allowance for the declining effects of international borders on world trade. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 327
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Changing Incidence of Geography
    Anderson, James E.
    Yotov, Yoto V.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 100 (05) : 2157 - 2186
  • [2] Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle
    Anderson, JE
    van Wincoop, E
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (01) : 170 - 192
  • [3] ANDERSON JE, 1979, AM ECON REV, V69, P106
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, HDB INTERANTIONAL EC
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2004, Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence
  • [6] [Anonymous], 17003 NBER
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2014, HDB INTERANTIONAL EC
  • [8] New Trade Models, Same Old Gains?
    Arkolakis, Costas
    Costinot, Arnaud
    Rodriguez-Clare, Andres
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) : 94 - 130
  • [9] Baier S., 2015, TRADE COOPERATION, P355
  • [10] Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade?
    Baier, Scott L.
    Bergstrand, Jeffrey H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 71 (01) : 72 - 95