Symmetry impedes symmetry discrimination

被引:15
作者
Tjan, BS
Liu, ZL
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Max Planck Inst Biol Cybernet, Tubingen, Germany
关键词
computational model; discrimination; face; random dots; symmetry;
D O I
10.1167/5.10.10
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Objects in the world, natural and artificial alike, are often bilaterally symmetric. The visual system is likely to take advantage of this regularity to encode shapes for efficient object recognition. The nature of encoding a symmetric shape, and of encoding any departure from it, is therefore an important matter in visual perception. We addressed this issue of shape encoding empirically, noting that a particular encoding scheme necessarily leads to a specific profile of sensitivity in perceptual discriminations. We studied symmetry discrimination using human faces and random dots. Each face stimulus was a frontal view of a three-dimensional (3-D) face model. The 3-D face model was a linearly weighted average ( a morph) between the model of an original face and that of the corresponding mirror face. Using this morphing technique to vary the degree of asymmetry, we found that, for faces and analogously generated random-dot patterns alike, symmetry discrimination was worst when the stimuli were nearly symmetric, in apparent opposition to almost all studies in the literature. We analyzed the previous work and reconciled the old and new results using a generic model with a simple nonlinearity. By defining asymmetry as the minimal difference between the left and right halves of an object, we found that the visual system was disproportionately more sensitive to larger departures from symmetry than to smaller ones. We further demonstrated that our empirical and modeling results were consistent with Weber-Fechner's and Stevens's laws.
引用
收藏
页码:888 / 900
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, HUMAN SYMMETRY PERCE
[2]   ON AVIAN ASYMMETRY - EVIDENCE OF NATURAL-SELECTION FOR SYMMETRICAL TAILS AND WINGS IN BIRDS [J].
BALMFORD, A ;
JONES, IL ;
THOMAS, ALR .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1993, 252 (1335) :245-251
[3]   VERSATILITY AND ABSOLUTE EFFICIENCY OF DETECTING MIRROR SYMMETRY IN RANDOM DOT DISPLAYS [J].
BARLOW, HB ;
REEVES, BC .
VISION RESEARCH, 1979, 19 (07) :783-793
[4]   OBLIGATORY EDGE ASSIGNMENT IN VISION - THE ROLE OF FIGURE AND PART SEGMENTATION IN SYMMETRY DETECTION [J].
BAYLIS, GC ;
DRIVER, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1995, 21 (06) :1323-1342
[5]  
BLANZ V, 1999, P 26 ANN C COMP GRAP, P187, DOI DOI 10.1145/311535.311556
[6]   The force of symmetry revisited:: symmetry-to-noise ratios regulate (a)symmetry effects [J].
Csathó, A ;
van der Vloed, G ;
van der Helm, PA .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2004, 117 (03) :233-250
[7]   SYMMETRY, BEAUTY AND EVOLUTION [J].
ENQUIST, M ;
ARAK, A .
NATURE, 1994, 372 (6502) :169-172
[8]   CONTRAST DETECTION AND NEAR-THRESHOLD DISCRIMINATION IN HUMAN-VISION [J].
FOLEY, JM ;
LEGGE, GE .
VISION RESEARCH, 1981, 21 (07) :1041-1053
[9]   FORCE OF SYMMETRY IN FORM PERCEPTION [J].
FREYD, J ;
TVERSKY, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 97 (01) :109-126
[10]  
GERBINO W, 1991, B PSYCHONOMIC SOC, V29, P480