Truman's Rhetoric Entrenches Unilateral Authority and Fashions a Trend for Future Executive Use

被引:1
作者
Fletcher, Kimberley L. [1 ]
机构
[1] San Diego State Univ, Dept Polit, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
关键词
constitutional order; presidential prerogatives; imperial president; unilateral decision making; Curtiss-Wright; rhetoric; sole-organ doctrine;
D O I
10.1111/psq.12397
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
In the 1936 case of United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., the U.S. Supreme Court reasoned that the president is the sole organ of foreign affairs given implicitly through the commander-in- chief clause. With over 10,000 citations (Code of Federal Regulations) and 145 Curtiss-Wright references by attorney generals and the Department of Justice justifying presidential prerogatives, the imperial president is enshrined in law. Even with recent challenges, the Court remains steadfast to unilateral executive decision making. However, few studies identify when the executive branch first adopts the Court's newly constituted constitutional order, and few provide a systematic analysis of how presidents advance the sole-organ doctrine. Building on this scholarship I show that President Truman's cohesive narrative of asserted unilateral powers redirects development for future executives to claim unfettered discretion.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 751
页数:32
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Adler DavidGray., 1996, CONSTITUTION CONDUCT, P19
  • [2] [Anonymous], THE KOREAN DECISION
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, ARC EMPIRE AM WARS A
  • [4] [Anonymous], TRUMAN ADM PROBLEMS
  • [5] [Anonymous], LEG AUTH SUPP ACT NA
  • [6] [Anonymous], YOUR OPINION
  • [7] [Anonymous], OUR DOCUMENTS 100 MI
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1954, MY NAME IS T CONNALL
  • [9] [Anonymous], 1960, PRESIDENTIAL POWER
  • [10] Azari J., 2014, DELIVERING PEOPLES M