Interface pressure in transtibial socket during ascent and descent on stairs and its effect on patient satisfaction

被引:43
作者
Ali, Sadeeq [1 ]
Abu Osman, Noor Azuan [1 ]
Eshraghi, Arezoo [1 ]
Gholizadeh, Hossein [1 ]
bin Abd Razak, Nasrul Anwar [1 ]
Abas, Wan Abu Bakar Bin Wan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Engn, Dept Biomed Engn, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
关键词
Satisfaction; Prosthetic interface systems; Pressure; Transtibial prosthesis; Amputee; TIBIAL PROSTHETIC SOCKET; RESIDUAL LIMB; SUCTION; SUSPENSION; DISTRIBUTIONS; AMPUTATION; MECHANICS; AMPUTEES; STRESSES; WALKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.09.004
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: Transtibial amputees encounter stairs and steps during their daily activities. The excessive pressure between residual limb/socket may reduce the walking capability of transtibial prosthetic users during ascent and descent on stairs. The purposes of the research were to evaluate the interface pressure between Dermo (shuttle lock) and Seal-In X5 (prosthetic valve) interface systems during stair ascent and descent, and to determine their satisfaction effects on users. Methods: Ten amputees with unilateral transtibial amputation participated in the study. Interface pressure was recorded with F-socket transducer (9811E) during stair ascent and descent at self-selected speed. Each participant filled in a questionnaire about satisfaction and problems encountered with the use of the two interface systems. Findings: The resultant mean peak pressure (kPa) was significantly lower for the Dermo interface system compared to that of the Seal-In X5 interface system at the anterior, posterior and medial regions during stair ascent (63.14 vs. 80.14, 63.14 vs. 90.44, 49.21 vs. 66.04, respectively) and descent (67.11 vs. 80.41, 64.12 vs. 8824, 47.33 vs. 65.11, respectively). Significant statistical difference existed between the two interface systems in terms of satisfaction and problems encountered (P < 0.05). Interpretation: The Dermo interface system caused less pressure within the prosthetic socket compared to the Seal-In X5 interface system during stair negotiation. The qualitative survey also showed that the prosthesis users experienced fewer problems and increased satisfaction with the Dermo interface system. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 999
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Clinical investigation of the interface pressure in the trans-tibial socket with Dermo and Seal-In X5 liner during walking and their effect on patient satisfaction
    Ali, Sadeeq
    Abu Osman, Noor Azuan
    Mortaza, Niyousha
    Eshraghi, Arezoo
    Gholizadeh, Hossein
    Abas, Wan Abu Bakar Bin Wan
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2012, 27 (09) : 943 - 948
  • [2] Comparison of interface pressures with pin and suction suspension systems
    Beil, TL
    Street, GM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 41 (6A) : 821 - 828
  • [3] Beil TL, 2002, J REHABIL RES DEV, V39, P693
  • [4] BENNETT L, 1979, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V60, P309
  • [5] A comparison of trans-tibial amputee suction and vacuum socket conditions
    Board, WJ
    Street, GM
    Caspers, C
    [J]. PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 25 (03) : 202 - 209
  • [6] CLUITMANS J, 1994, PROSTHET ORTHOT INT, V18, P78
  • [7] Convery P, 1999, PROSTHET ORTHOT INT, V23, P107
  • [8] Pressure distribution at the stump/socket interface in transtibial amputees during walking on stairs, slope and non-flat road
    Dou, Peng
    Jia, Xiaohong
    Suo, Shuangfu
    Wang, Rencheng
    Zhang, Ming
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2006, 21 (10) : 1067 - 1073
  • [9] Ambulation monitoring of transtibial amputation subjects with patient activity monitor versus pedometer
    Dudek, Nancy L.
    Khan, Omar D.
    Lemaire, Edward D.
    Marks, Meridith B.
    Saville, Leyana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 45 (04) : 577 - 585
  • [10] Dermatologic conditions associated with use of a lower-extremity prosthesis
    Dudek, NL
    Marks, MB
    Marshall, SC
    Chardon, JP
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2005, 86 (04): : 659 - 663