Identifying crop water stress using deep learning models

被引:99
作者
Chandel, Narendra Singh [1 ]
Chakraborty, Subir Kumar [1 ]
Rajwade, Yogesh Anand [1 ]
Dubey, Kumkum [1 ]
Tiwari, Mukesh K. [2 ]
Jat, Dilip [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Inst Agr Engn, ICAR, Bhopal, India
[2] Anand Agr Univ, Coll Agr Engn & Technol, Godhra, Gujarat, India
关键词
Crop phenotyping; Confusion matrix; DCNN; Digital agriculture; Machine learning; NEURAL-NETWORK; CLASSIFICATION; FUSION; IDENTIFICATION; TOLERANCE; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1007/s00521-020-05325-4
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The identification of water stress is a major challenge for timely and effective irrigation to ensure global food security and sustainable agriculture. Several direct and indirect methods exist for identification of crop water stress, but they are time consuming, tedious and require highly sophisticated sensors or equipment. Image processing is one of the techniques which can help in the assessment of water stress directly. Machine learning techniques combined with image processing can aid in identifying water stress beyond the limitations of traditional image processing. Deep learning (DL) techniques have gained momentum recently for image classification and the convolutional neural network based on DL is being applied widely. In present study, comparative assessment of three DL models: AlexNet, GoogLeNet and Inception V3 are applied for identification of water stress in maize (Zea mays), okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) and soybean (Glycine max) crops. A total of 1200 digital images were acquired for each crop to form the input dataset for the deep learning models. Among the three models, performance of GoogLeNet was found to be superior with an accuracy of 98.3, 97.5 and 94.1% for maize, okra and soybean, respectively. The onset of convergence in GoogLeNet models commenced after 8 epochs with 22 (maize), 31 (okra) and 15 (soybean) iterations per epoch with error rate of less than 7.5%.
引用
收藏
页码:5353 / 5367
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
[41]  
SZEGEDY C, 2016, PROC CVPR IEEE, P2818, DOI DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2016.308
[42]  
Szegedy C, 2014, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1312.6199, DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594]
[43]  
Szegedy C, 2017, AAAI CONF ARTIF INTE, P4278
[44]  
Taiz L., 2010, Plant Physiology, VFifth
[45]  
Tan MX, 2019, PR MACH LEARN RES, V97
[46]   Crop pest classification based on deep convolutional neural network and transfer learning [J].
Thenmozhi, K. ;
Reddy, U. Srinivasulu .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2019, 164
[47]   Genomics-based approaches to improve drought tolerance of crops [J].
Tuberosa, Roberto ;
Salvi, Silvio .
TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2006, 11 (08) :405-412
[48]   The use of plant models in deep learning: an application to leaf counting in rosette plants [J].
Ubbens, Jordan ;
Cieslak, Mikolaj ;
Prusinkiewicz, Przemyslaw ;
Stavness, Ian .
PLANT METHODS, 2018, 14
[49]   Remote sensing and machine learning for crop water stress determination in various crops: a critical review [J].
Virnodkar, Shyamal S. ;
Pachghare, Vinod K. ;
Patil, V. C. ;
Jha, Sunil Kumar .
PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2020, 21 (05) :1121-1155
[50]   SIFT Based Vein Recognition Models: Analysis and Improvement [J].
Wang, Guoqing ;
Wang, Jun .
COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 2017