Efficacy and Safety of Levomilnacipran Sustained Release 40 mg, 80 mg, or 120 mg in Major Depressive Disorder: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

被引:66
作者
Asnis, Gregory M. [1 ]
Bose, Anjana [2 ]
Gommoll, Carl P. [2 ]
Chen, Changzheng [2 ]
Greenberg, William M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Montefiore Med Ctr, Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[2] Forest Res Inst, Jersey City, NJ USA
关键词
STAR-ASTERISK-D; CLINICAL-TRIALS; RATING-SCALE; MILNACIPRAN; REMISSION; ANTIDEPRESSANTS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.4088/JCP.12m08197
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective:This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of fixed-dose levomilnacipran sustained release (SR) compared with placebo in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD); the study was conducted from September 2009-May 2011. Method: Outpatients met DSM-IV-TR criteria for MDD with an ongoing major depressive episode >= 8 weeks' duration. After a 1-week placebo lead-in, patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 179) or levomilnacipran SR 40 mg (n = 181), 80 mg (n = 181), or 120 mg (n = 183) once daily for 8 weeks of double-blind treatment, followed by a 2-week double-blind down-taper. The primary efficacy parameter was change from baseline on the clinician-rated Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. The prespecified secondary efficacy parameter was change from baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) total score. Additional efficacy measures included the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17) and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and -Improvement (CGI-I). Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. Results:The least squares mean difference (LSMD) for change from baseline in MADRS total score was significantly superior to placebo for all dose groups: -3.23 (P=.0186), -3.99 (P=.0038), and -4.86 (P=.0005) for levomilnacipran SR 40, 80, and 120 mg, respectively. The LSMD was significantly different for levomilnacipran SR 80 mg and 120 mg versus placebo on the SDS (-2.51 and -2.57, respectively, P < .05 for both doses), HDRS17 (-2.09 and -2.34, respectively, P < .05 for both doses), CGI-S (-0.43 [P<.01] and -0.35 [P<.05], respectively), and CGI-I (-0.34 and -0.32, respectively, P<.05 for both doses) assessments. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (>= 10% of any treatment group) were headache, nausea, constipation, dry mouth, increased heart rate, and hyperhidrosis. Conclusions: Levomilnacipran SR demonstrated significant improvement in depressive symptoms and functioning relative to placebo. In this study, levomilnacipran SR was generally well tolerated. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00969709 J Clin Psychiatry 2013;74(3):242-248 (C) Copyright 2013 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 248
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
[2]  
Depoortere R, 2011, 66 ANN M SOC BIOL PS
[3]   A double-blind comparison of the efficacy and safety of milnacipran and fluoxetine in depressed inpatients [J].
Guelfi, JD ;
Ansseau, M ;
Corruble, E ;
Samuelian, JC ;
Tonelli, I ;
Tournoux, A ;
Pletan, Y .
INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 13 (03) :121-128
[4]  
Guy W., 1976, ASSESSMENT MANUAL PS
[5]   A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION [J].
HAMILTON, M .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1960, 23 (01) :56-62
[6]   MORE POWERFUL PROCEDURES FOR MULTIPLE SIGNIFICANCE TESTING [J].
HOCHBERG, Y ;
BENJAMINI, Y .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1990, 9 (07) :811-818
[7]   Remission in depression: definition and initial treatment approaches [J].
Israel, JA .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 20 (03) :5-10
[8]   COMBINING 2X2 TABLES THAT CONTAIN STRUCTURAL ZEROS [J].
JOHNSON, WD ;
MAY, WL .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (17) :1901-1911
[9]   Comparative studies with milnacipran and tricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of patients with major depression: A summary of clinical trial results [J].
Kasper, S ;
Pletan, Y ;
Solles, A ;
Tournoux, A .
INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 11 :35-39
[10]  
Kasper Siegfried, 2011, Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, V7, P21, DOI 10.2147/NDT.S19615