Drivers, barriers and social considerations for AI adoption in business and management: A tertiary study

被引:150
作者
Cubric, Marija [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire Business Sch, Coll Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, Herts, England
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Business; Machine learning; Management; Systematic literature review; Tertiary study; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; METHODOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE; TYPOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101257
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
The number of academic papers in the area of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its applications across business and management domains has risen significantly in the last decade, and that rise has been followed by an increase in the number of systematic literature reviews. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of existing systematic reviews in this growing area of research and to synthesise the findings related to drivers, barriers and social implications of the AI adoption in business and management. The methodology used for this tertiary study is based on Kitchenham and Charter's guidelines [14], resulting in a selection of 30 reviews published between 2005 and 2019 which are reporting results of 2021 primary studies. These reviews cover the AI adoption across various business sectors (healthcare, information technology, energy, agriculture, apparel industry, engineering, smart cities, tourism and transport), management and business functions (HR, customer services, supply chain, health and safety, project management, decision-support, systems management and technology adoption). While the drivers for the AI adoption in these areas are mainly economic, the barriers are related to the technical aspects (e.g. availability of data, reusability of models) as well as the social considerations such as, increased dependence on non-humans, job security, lack of knowledge, safety, trust and lack of multiple stakeholders'perspectives. Very few reviews outside of the healthcare management domain consider human, organisational and wider societal factors of the AI adoption. In addition to increased focus on social implications of AI, the reviews are recommending more rigorous evaluation, increased use of hybrid solutions (AI and non-AI) and multidisciplinary approach to AI design and evaluation. Furthermore, this study found that there is a lack of systematic reviews in some of the early AI adoption sectors such as financial industry and retail.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Arksey H., 2005, Int J Soc Res Methodol [Internet], V8, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
  • [2] APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES IN HEALTHCARE: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
    Atanasov, P.
    Gauthier, A.
    Lopes, R.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S84 - S84
  • [3] Booth A., 2016, Systematic approaches to a successful literature review, V2nd
  • [4] Reporting systematic reviews: Some lessons from a tertiary study
    Budgen, David
    Brereton, Pearl
    Drummond, Sarah
    Williams, Nikki
    [J]. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 95 : 62 - 74
  • [5] Bughin J., 2018, MGI RES DISCUSSION P
  • [6] Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer staging: A meta-analysis
    Chen, Shao-Hui
    Li, Zhao-Ai
    Huang, Rui
    Xue, Hui-Qin
    [J]. TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 55 (04): : 488 - 494
  • [7] Embracing the sobering reality of technological influences on jobs, employment and human resource development: A systematic literature review
    Chuang, Szufang
    Graham, Carroll Marion
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 42 (7/8) : 400 - 416
  • [8] Chui M, 2018, WHAT AI CAN CANT YET
  • [9] A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies
    Grant, Maria J.
    Booth, Andrew
    [J]. HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL, 2009, 26 (02) : 91 - 108
  • [10] Technology and the good society
    Griffy-Brown, Charla
    Earp, Brian D.
    Rosas, Omar
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2018, 52 : 1 - 3