A Novel Approach to Measuring Efficiency of Scientific Research Projects: Data Envelopment Analysis

被引:12
作者
Dilts, David M. [1 ]
Zell, Adrienne [2 ]
Orwoll, Eric [3 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Oregon Clin & Translat Res Inst, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
来源
CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE | 2015年 / 8卷 / 05期
关键词
cost-benefit analysis; methodology; statistics; PRIMARY-HEALTH-CARE;
D O I
10.1111/cts.12303
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
PurposeMeasuring the efficiency of resource allocation for the conduct of scientific projects in medical research is difficult due to, among other factors, the heterogeneity of resources supplied (e.g., dollars or FTEs) and outcomes expected (e.g., grants, publications). While this is an issue in medical science, it has been approached successfully in other fields by using data envelopment analysis (DEA). DEA has a number of advantages over other techniques as it simultaneously uses multiple heterogeneous inputs and outputs to determine which projects are performing most efficiently, referred to as being at the efficiency frontier, when compared to others in the data set. MethodThis research uses DEA for the evaluation of supported translational science projects by the Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute (OCTRI), a NCATS Clinical & Translational Science Award (CTSA) recipient. ResultsThese results suggest that the primary determinate of overall project efficiency at OCTRI is the amount of funding, with smaller amounts of funding providing more efficiency than larger funding amounts. ConclusionThese results, and the use of DEA, highlight both the success of using this technique in helping determine medical research efficiency and those factors to consider when distributing funds for new projects at CTSAs.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 501
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Measuring for Knowledge: A Data-Driven Research Approach for eGovernment [J].
Verdegem, Pieter ;
Stragier, Jeroen ;
Verleye, Gino .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON EGOVERNMENT, 2010, :417-424
[22]   Comparative Efficiency Assessment of Primary Care Service Delivery Models Using Data Envelopment Analysis [J].
Milliken, Olga ;
Devlin, Rose Anne ;
Barham, Victoria ;
Hogg, William ;
Dahrouge, Simone ;
Russell, Grant .
CANADIAN PUBLIC POLICY-ANALYSE DE POLITIQUES, 2011, 37 (01) :85-109
[23]   Data envelopment analysis cross-efficiency of primary health care in Lagos metropolis, Nigeria [J].
Adejoh, Friday Oduh ;
Ali, Majid khan Bin Majahar ;
Ismail, Mohd Tahir .
SCIENTIFIC AFRICAN, 2022, 17
[24]   Measuring the effect of deprivation on primary health care performance using data envelopment analysis and Malmquist Indices [J].
Merelie, Holly Bea ;
Amado, Carla Alexandra Filipe ;
dos Santos, Sergio Pereira .
HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2025,
[25]   A stochastic data envelopment analysis approach for multi-criteria ABC inventory classification [J].
Tavassoli, Mohammad ;
Saen, Reza Farzipoor .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 2022, 39 (06) :415-429
[26]   Analysis and Enlightenment of Scientific Research Data in Shaanxi University Libraries [J].
Wu, Yan .
8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, ICISE 2023, 2023, :69-73
[27]   Investigation of factors affecting efficiency of primary healthcare in Turkey with two-stage data envelopment analysis [J].
Ilgun, Gulnur ;
Sahin, Bayram .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 15 (01) :45-51
[28]   Applying a network data envelopment analysis model to quantify the eco-efficiency of products: a case study of pesticides [J].
Zhu, Zengyin ;
Wang, Ke ;
Zhang, Bing .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 69 :67-73
[29]   Efficiency analysis for stochastic dynamic facility layout problem using meta-heuristic, data envelopment analysis and machine learning [J].
Tayal, Akash ;
Kose, Utku ;
Solanki, Arun ;
Nayyar, Anand ;
Marmolejo Saucedo, Jose Antonio .
COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 36 (01) :172-202
[30]   A cautionary note on methods of comparing programmatic efficiency between two or more groups of DMUs in data envelopment analysis [J].
Gary Simpson .
Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2007, 28 :141-147