Age, parity, history of abortion and contraceptive choices affect the risk of repeat abortion

被引:155
作者
Heikinheimo, Oskari [1 ]
Gissler, Mika [2 ]
Suhonen, Satu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, SF-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Natl Res & Dev Ctr Welf & Hlth, SF-00531 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
contraception; compliance efficacy; intrauterine device; termination of pregnancy;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2008.03.013
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: The rate of repeat induced abortion varies from 30% to 38% in northern Europe. Thus, repeat abortion is an important public health issue. However, risk factors as regards repeat abortion are poorly understood. We characterized risk factors related to sociodemographic characteristics, history of abortion and post-abortal contraception. Study design: A prospective cohort study of 1269 women undergoing medical abortion between August 2000 and December 2002 was conducted. The subj. ects were followed via the Finnish Registry of Induced Abortions until December 2005, the follow-up time (mean SD) being 49.2 8.0 months. Results: Altogether, 179 (14. 1 %) of the subjects requested repeat abortion within the follow-up time. In univariate analysis, a history of prior abortion, being parous, young age, smoking and failure to attend the follow-up visit were associated with repeat abortion. Immediate - in contrast to postponed - initiation of any contraceptive method was linked to a lower risk of repeat abortion. In comparison with combined oral contraceptives, use of intrauterine contraception was most efficacious in reducing the risk of another pregnancy termination. In multivariate analysis, the effects of young age, being parous, smoking, a history of prior abortion and type of contraception on the risk of another abortion persisted. Conclusions: An increased focus on young women, parous women and those with a history of abortion may be efficacious in decreasing repeat abortion. Contraceptive choices made at the time of abortion have an important effect on the rate of repeat abortion. Use of intrauterine contraceptives for post-abortal contraception was associated with decreased risk of repeat abortion. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 154
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Contraception at the time of abortion: high-risk time or high-risk women? [J].
Bajos, Nathalie ;
Lamarche-Vadel, Agathe ;
Gilbert, Fabien ;
Ferrand, Michele ;
Moreau, Caroline .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2006, 21 (11) :2862-2867
[2]   Effectiveness of preabortion counseling on postabortion contraceptive use [J].
Bender, SS ;
Geirsson, RT .
CONTRACEPTION, 2004, 69 (06) :481-487
[3]   Previous abortion and the risk of low birth weight and preterm births [J].
Brown, J. S., Jr. ;
Adera, T. ;
Masho, S. W. .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2008, 62 (01) :16-22
[4]   Characteristics of women undergoing repeat induced abortion [J].
Fisher, WA ;
Singh, SS ;
Shuper, PA ;
Carey, M ;
Otchet, F ;
Maclean-Brine, D ;
Dal Bello, D ;
Gunter, J .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2005, 172 (05) :637-641
[5]   Declining induced abortion rate in Finland: Data quality of the Finnish Abortion Register [J].
Gissler, M ;
Ulander, V ;
Hemminki, E ;
Rasimus, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 25 (02) :376-380
[6]   Termination of early pregnancy using flexible, low-dose mifepristone-misoprostol regimens [J].
Heikiaelmo, Oskari ;
Leminen, Riikka ;
Sullonen, Satu .
CONTRACEPTION, 2007, 76 (06) :456-460
[7]   IMMEDIATE POST-ABORTAL INSERTION OF A LEVONORGESTREL-RELEASING IUD [J].
HEIKKILA, M ;
LAHTEENMAKI, P ;
LUUKKAINEN, T .
CONTRACEPTION, 1982, 26 (03) :245-259
[8]   Induced abortion as a risk factor for subsequent fetal loss [J].
InfanteRivard, C ;
Gauthier, R .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 7 (05) :540-542
[9]   Socioeconomic status and smoking [J].
Laaksonen, M ;
Rahkonen, O ;
Karvonen, S ;
Lahelma, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 15 (03) :262-269
[10]   Counseling in the clinical setting to prevent unintended pregnancy: an evidence-based research agenda [J].
Moos, MK ;
Bartholomew, NE ;
Lohr, KN .
CONTRACEPTION, 2003, 67 (02) :115-132