Role of nebulised dexmedetomidine, midazolam or ketamine as premedication in preschool children undergoing general anaesthesia-A prospective, double-blind, randomised study

被引:10
作者
Shereef, Muhammed K. [1 ]
Chaitali, Biswas [1 ]
Swapnadeep, Sengupta [1 ]
Gaurl, Mukheriee [1 ]
机构
[1] Calcutta Natl Med Coll, Dept Anaesthesiol, Kolkata, W Bengal, India
关键词
Children; dexmedetomidine; ketamine; midazolam; separation anxiety; EMERGENCE DELIRIUM; PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS; INDUCTION; EFFICACY; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.4103/ija.ija_931_21
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Preschool age children are psycho-biologically vulnerable to all surgical procedures. In this study, we investigated the effect of nebulised dexmedetomidine, midazolam and ketamine as sedative premedication for alleviating parental separation anxiety, facilitating face mask acceptance and reducing emergence agitation in paediatric patients undergoing general anaesthesia. Methods: A prospective, randomised, double-blind study was done involving 96 children of age 3-7 years, randomly allocated into three equal groups and pre-medicated with either nebulised dexmedetomidine 2 mu g/kg (GroupD), midazolam 0.2 mg/kg (GroupM) or ketamine 2 mg/kg (Group K). The scores of sedation scale, parental separation anxiety scale, mask acceptance scale and emergence agitation scale were recorded along with haemodynamic parameters. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), post hoc test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for statistical analysis. Results: A statistically significant difference in sedation score was seen between the different study groups, chi 2(2) = 8.561, P = 0.014 with mean rank sedation score of 56.50 for Group D, 38.92 for Group M and 43.84 for Group K. Parental separation anxiety scale score and Mask acceptance scale score also showed statistically significant difference between the different study groups, chi(2)(2) = 9.369, P = 0.009 and chi(2)(2) = 11.97, P = 0.003, respectively. Conclusion: Nebulisation with dexmedetomidine produced easy parental separation, more satisfactory sedation and face mask acceptance with less postoperative agitation than nebulisation with midazolam or ketamine.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 206
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Comparison of nebulised dexmedetomidine, ketamine, or midazolam for premedication in preschool children undergoing bone marrow biopsy [J].
Abdel-Ghaffar, H. S. ;
Kamal, S. M. ;
El Sheriff, F. A. ;
Mohamed, S. A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 121 (02) :445-452
[2]   Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication of pediatric patients undergoing anesthesia [J].
Akin, Aynur ;
Bayram, Adnan ;
Esmaoglu, Aliye ;
Tosun, Zeynep ;
Aksu, Recep ;
Altuntas, Resul ;
Boyaci, Adem .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2012, 22 (09) :871-876
[3]   A comparison of emergence delirium scales following general anesthesia in children [J].
Bajwa, Samira A. ;
Costi, David ;
Cyna, Allan M. .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2010, 20 (08) :704-711
[4]  
Bhat Ravi, 2016, Anesth Essays Res, V10, P349, DOI 10.4103/0259-1162.172340
[5]   Premedication and induction of anaesthesia in paediatric patients [J].
Dave, Nandini Malay .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 63 (09) :713-720
[6]  
De A, 2013, INT J BASIC APPL MED, V3, P208
[7]   The IJA postgraduate educational issue on current concepts in paediatric anaesthesia [J].
Doctor, Jeson R. ;
Malde, Anila ;
Yaddanapudi, Sandhya .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 63 (09) :688-689
[8]  
Grewal Anju, 2011, J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, V27, P297, DOI 10.4103/0970-9185.83670
[9]   Trends in the practice of parental presence during induction of anesthesia and the use of preoperative sedative premedication in the United States, 1995-2002: Results of a follow-up national survey [J].
Kain, ZN ;
Caldwell-Andrews, AA ;
Krivutza, DM ;
Weinberg, ME ;
Wang, SM ;
Gaal, D .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 98 (05) :1252-1259
[10]   Preoperative anxiety and emergence delirium and postoperative maladaptive behaviors [J].
Kain, ZN ;
Caldwell-Andrews, AA ;
Maranets, I ;
McClain, B ;
Gaal, D ;
Mayes, LC ;
Feng, R ;
Zhang, HP .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 99 (06) :1648-1654