Obstetric Outcomes in Adolescents Related to Body Mass Index and Compared with Low-Risk Adult Women

被引:2
作者
Isgren, Anna Ramo [1 ,2 ]
Kjolhede, Preben [1 ,2 ]
Blomberg, Marie [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, SE-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
obstetric outcomes; overweight; obesity; adolescents; MATERNAL OBESITY; OVERWEIGHT; PREGNANCY; DELIVERY; IMPACT; BIRTH; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1089/jwh.2016.5938
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate in adolescents the association between body mass index (BMI) and obstetric outcomes and to determine whether the outcomes in the BMI groups of adolescents differ from those of a low-risk population of adult women. Materials and Methods: This is a nationwide population-based register study. Obstetric outcomes of 31,386 singleton primiparous adolescents were evaluated in relation to BMI classes. Furthermore, the outcomes of the adolescents and 178,844 normal weight, nonsmoking, singleton primiparous women, 25-29 years old with no known comorbidity, defined as standard women, were compared. Multiple logistic regression models were used. Results are presented as crude odds ratios (ORs) or adjusted ORs and with a 95% confidence interval. Results: Compared with normal weight adolescents, obese adolescents had a lower chance of a normal vaginal delivery (VD)76% versus 85% [adjusted OR 0.61 (0.55-0.68)], a higher risk for acute cesarean section (CS)8.9% versus 4.5% [adjusted OR 2.45 (2.08-2.88)], and stillbirth0.7% versus 0.2% [adjusted OR 3.17 (1.74-5.77)]. Compared with standard women, overweight adolescents had a higher chance of a normal VD82% versus 75% [crude OR 1.53 (1.44-1.64)] and a lower risk for acute CS6.3% versus 7.1% [crude OR 0.85 (0.76-0.95)]. Obese adolescents had a lower risk for instrumental VD8% versus 13% [crude OR 0.61 (0.53-0.71)] and obstetric anal sphincter injury1% versus 3% [crude OR 0.38 (0.26-0.57)]. Conclusion: Several adverse obstetric outcomes were obesity related among adolescents. Overweight adolescents seemed to have better obstetric outcomes than standard women, something to consider when optimizing resources for women during pregnancy and delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 434
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Joint Effect of Obesity and Teenage Pregnancy on the Risk of Preeclampsia: A Population-Based Study [J].
Aliyu, Muktar H. ;
Luke, Sabrina ;
Kristensen, Sibylle ;
Alio, Amina P. ;
Salihu, Hamisu M. .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2010, 46 (01) :77-82
[2]   The Swedish Medical Birth Register [J].
Axelsson, O .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 82 (06) :491-492
[3]   Obesity and the challenges of caesarean delivery: Prevention and management of wound complications [J].
Ayres-de-Campos, Diogo .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 29 (03) :406-414
[4]   Pregnancy complications and outcomes among overweight and obese nulliparous women [J].
Baeten, JM ;
Bukusi, EA ;
Lambe, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 91 (03) :436-440
[5]   Estimating risk factors for spontaneous preterm delivery in teen pregnancies [J].
Baker, Arthur M. ;
Haeri, Sina .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2014, 289 (06) :1203-1206
[6]   Avoiding the first cesarean section-results of structured organizational and cultural changes [J].
Blomberg, Marie .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 95 (05) :580-586
[7]   Impact of maternal age on obstetric and neonatal outcome with emphasis on primiparous adolescents and older women: a Swedish Medical Birth Register Study [J].
Blomberg, Marie ;
Tyrberg, Rasmus Birch ;
Kjolhede, Preben .
BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (11)
[8]   Maternal Obesity and Risk of Postpartum Hemorrhage [J].
Blomberg, Marie .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (03) :561-568
[9]   Adolescent pregnancy: a culturally complex issue [J].
Braine, Theresa .
BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2009, 87 (06) :410-411
[10]   Maternal morbid obesity and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome [J].
Cedergren, MI .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (02) :219-224