Do modern family planning methods impact women's quality of life? Jordanian women's perspective

被引:13
作者
Alyahya, Mohammad S. [1 ]
Hijazi, Heba H. [1 ]
Alshraideh, Hussam A. [2 ]
Al-sheyab, Nihaya A. [3 ]
Alomari, Dana [1 ]
Malkawi, Sara [1 ]
Qassas, Sarah [1 ]
Darabseh, Samah [1 ]
Khader, Yousef S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, POB 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan
[2] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Engn, Ind Engn, POB 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan
[3] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Appl Med Sci, Allied Med Sci Dept, POB 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan
[4] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Community Med Publ Hlth & Family Med, Med Educ & Biostat, Irbid 22110, Jordan
关键词
Quality of life; QoL; Contraceptives; Family planning methods; WHOQOL-BREF; Jordan; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; SEXUAL FUNCTION; UNINTENDED PREGNANCY; TUBAL-LIGATION; IRANIAN WOMEN; EMPOWERMENT; CONTRACEPTION; SATISFACTION; CONTINUATION; IMPLANT;
D O I
10.1186/s12955-019-1226-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Although Jordan has made progress in meeting Family Planning (FP) needs in last decades, recently the use of FP methods has declined significantly. Women's personal experiences, knowledge, and perceptions of how a FP method might impact their quality of life (QoL) can influence FP decisions. However, a lack of comprehensive understanding of the impact of modern FP methods on women's QoL continues to exist among Jordanian couples. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between the use of common modern FP methods and QoL among Jordanian women. Methods Using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire along with other questions, non-pregnant women of reproductive age were interviewed at their homes through face-to-face structured interviews. Women who visited the obstetrics and gynecology clinic of King Abdullah University Hospital for contraceptive advice and follow-up consultations were also included. Results A total of 548 women aged between 18 and 49 participated in the study. Based on the WHOQOL-BREF scale, the overall mean (SD) scores of the four domains were found to be average. Our findings show that women who used Intra Uterine Devices (IUDs) and women whose husbands used condoms had better QoL in the four domains (physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment) than those who used Oral Contraceptives (OCs). Women who used implant and injectable hormonal contraceptives had better QoL in terms of the physical health and social relationships domains. In contrast, women who had undergone permanent sterilization had lower QoL scores in all of the four domains. Further analysis revealed that women who had undergone tubal sterilization were less satisfied overall and more likely to experience side effects than women who used OCs. Conclusion The choice to use contraceptives and decide freely whether and when to have children is regarded as a fundamental reproductive health right and is strongly linked to women's health and QoL. Women who use OCs and women who have undergone permanent sterilization are likely to have lower QoL than women who use IUDs or implant and injectable hormones and those whose husbands use condoms.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [71] Sudanagunta S, 2016, THESIS
  • [72] Tadayon M, 2017, INT J REPROD CONTRAC, V5, P2630
  • [73] Increasing the uptake of long-acting and permanent methods of family planning: A qualitative study with village midwives in East Java']Java and Nusa Tenggara Barat Provinces, Indonesia
    Titaley, Christiana R.
    Wijayanti, Ratna U.
    Damayanti, Rita
    Setiawan, Agus Dwi
    Kes, Dadun M.
    Dachlia, Dini
    Siagian, Ferdinand
    Suparno, Heru
    Saputri, Dwi Astuti Yunita
    Harlan, Sarah
    Wahyuningrum, Yunita
    Storey, Douglas
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2017, 53 : 55 - 62
  • [74] Hormonal contraception and mental health: results of a population-based study
    Toffol, E.
    Heikinheimo, O.
    Koponen, P.
    Luoto, R.
    Partonen, T.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (11) : 3085 - 3093
  • [75] Family Planning and the Burden of Unintended Pregnancies
    Tsui, Amy O.
    McDonald-Mosley, Raegan
    Burke, Anne E.
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 2010, 32 (01) : 152 - 174
  • [76] Umran O., 2016, INT J CARING SCI, V9, P997
  • [77] United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and Jordan Communication Advocacy and Policy Activity, FAM PLANN SYR REF JO
  • [78] Women's empowerment and fertility: A review of the literature
    Upadhyay, Ushma D.
    Gipson, Jessica D.
    Withers, Mellissa
    Lewis, Shayna
    Ciaraldi, Erica J.
    Fraser, Ashley
    Huchko, Megan J.
    Prata, Ndola
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2014, 115 : 111 - 120
  • [79] Unscheduled bleeding and contraceptive choice: increasing satisfaction and continuation rates
    Villavicencio, Jennifer
    Allen, Rebecca H.
    [J]. OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 7 : 43 - 52
  • [80] Wanyonyi Sikolia Z, 2011, Contraception, V84, pe17, DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.05.022