Do modern family planning methods impact women's quality of life? Jordanian women's perspective

被引:13
作者
Alyahya, Mohammad S. [1 ]
Hijazi, Heba H. [1 ]
Alshraideh, Hussam A. [2 ]
Al-sheyab, Nihaya A. [3 ]
Alomari, Dana [1 ]
Malkawi, Sara [1 ]
Qassas, Sarah [1 ]
Darabseh, Samah [1 ]
Khader, Yousef S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, POB 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan
[2] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Engn, Ind Engn, POB 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan
[3] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Appl Med Sci, Allied Med Sci Dept, POB 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan
[4] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Community Med Publ Hlth & Family Med, Med Educ & Biostat, Irbid 22110, Jordan
关键词
Quality of life; QoL; Contraceptives; Family planning methods; WHOQOL-BREF; Jordan; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; SEXUAL FUNCTION; UNINTENDED PREGNANCY; TUBAL-LIGATION; IRANIAN WOMEN; EMPOWERMENT; CONTRACEPTION; SATISFACTION; CONTINUATION; IMPLANT;
D O I
10.1186/s12955-019-1226-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Although Jordan has made progress in meeting Family Planning (FP) needs in last decades, recently the use of FP methods has declined significantly. Women's personal experiences, knowledge, and perceptions of how a FP method might impact their quality of life (QoL) can influence FP decisions. However, a lack of comprehensive understanding of the impact of modern FP methods on women's QoL continues to exist among Jordanian couples. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between the use of common modern FP methods and QoL among Jordanian women. Methods Using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire along with other questions, non-pregnant women of reproductive age were interviewed at their homes through face-to-face structured interviews. Women who visited the obstetrics and gynecology clinic of King Abdullah University Hospital for contraceptive advice and follow-up consultations were also included. Results A total of 548 women aged between 18 and 49 participated in the study. Based on the WHOQOL-BREF scale, the overall mean (SD) scores of the four domains were found to be average. Our findings show that women who used Intra Uterine Devices (IUDs) and women whose husbands used condoms had better QoL in the four domains (physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment) than those who used Oral Contraceptives (OCs). Women who used implant and injectable hormonal contraceptives had better QoL in terms of the physical health and social relationships domains. In contrast, women who had undergone permanent sterilization had lower QoL scores in all of the four domains. Further analysis revealed that women who had undergone tubal sterilization were less satisfied overall and more likely to experience side effects than women who used OCs. Conclusion The choice to use contraceptives and decide freely whether and when to have children is regarded as a fundamental reproductive health right and is strongly linked to women's health and QoL. Women who use OCs and women who have undergone permanent sterilization are likely to have lower QoL than women who use IUDs or implant and injectable hormones and those whose husbands use condoms.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [21] Impact of Contraception on Female Sexual Function
    Casey, Petra M.
    MacLaughlin, Kathy L.
    Faubion, Stephanie S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2017, 26 (03) : 207 - 213
  • [22] Contraception for adolescents in low and middle income countries: needs, barriers, and access
    Chandra-Mouli, Venkatraman
    McCarraher, Donna R.
    Phillips, Sharon J.
    Williamson, Nancy E.
    Hainsworth, Gwyn
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2014, 11
  • [23] Estimates of Side Effects Counseling in Family Planning Using Three Data Sources: Implications for Monitoring and Survey Design
    Choi, Yoonjoung
    [J]. STUDIES IN FAMILY PLANNING, 2018, 49 (01) : 23 - 39
  • [24] One year quality of life measured with SEC-QoL in levonorgestrel 52 mg IUS users
    Cristobal, Ignacio
    Ignacio Lete, Luis
    de la Viuda, Esther
    Perulero, Nuria
    Arbat, Agnes
    Canals, Ignasi
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 93 (04) : 367 - 371
  • [25] Perceptions of and barriers to family planning services in the poorest regions of Chiapas, Mexico: a qualitative study of men, women, and adolescents
    Dansereau, Emily
    Schaefer, Alexandra
    Hernandez, Bernardo
    Nelson, Jennifer
    Palmisano, Erin
    Rios-Zertuche, Diego
    Woldeab, Alex
    Zuniga, Maria Paola
    Iriarte, Emma Margarita
    Mokdad, Ali H.
    El Bcheraoui, Charbel
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2017, 14
  • [26] Dawass M, 2015, POV JORD
  • [27] [Department of Statistics Department of Statistics Labor], 2018, LAB STAT JORD 2012 2
  • [28] Impact of an implantable steroid contraceptive (etonogestrel-releasing implant) on quality of life and sexual function: a preliminary study
    Di Carlo, Costantino
    Sansone, Anna
    De Rosa, Nicoletta
    Gargano, Virginia
    Tommaselli, Giovanni Antonio
    Nappi, Carmine
    Bifulco, Giuseppe
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2014, 30 (01) : 53 - 56
  • [29] Counseling Women and Couples on Family Planning: A Randomized Study in Jordan
    El-Khoury, Marianne
    Thornton, Rebecca
    Chatterji, Minki
    Kamhawi, Sarah
    Sloane, Phoebe
    Halassa, Mays
    [J]. STUDIES IN FAMILY PLANNING, 2016, 47 (03) : 222 - 238
  • [30] Eqtait Faeda Ayed., 2019, Open Journal of Nursing, V9, P294, DOI [10.4236/ojn.2019.93028, DOI 10.4236/OJN.2019.93028]