Barriers to access: Results from focus groups to identify genetic service needs in the community

被引:29
作者
Beene-Harris, Rosalyn Y.
Wang, Catharine
Bach, Janice V.
机构
[1] Michigan Dept Community Hlth, Lansing, MI 48913 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Hlth Educ, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Michigan Ctr Genom & Publ Hlth, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
needs assessment; genetic services; genomic medicine;
D O I
10.1159/000096275
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objective: In efforts to prepare for implications of genomic advances, a needs assessment was undertaken from 2000 to 2002 by the Michigan Department of Community Health to develop a comprehensive state plan for genetic services. This paper reports on the access barriers to genetic services identified from focus groups conducted with members of the community and genetic service providers. Methods: Included in this study were the following five target groups: a sickle cell anemia parent support group, a Native American student group, parents of children with birth defects or other special health care needs, adults with genetic conditions, and genetic service providers from the statewide genetic counselors' association. Discussions of all groups were audio taped, transcribed and analyzed using content analysis. Results: Individual barriers to access identified included lack of awareness of personal risk, lack of knowledge of genetic services and resources, and lack of trust/fear of discrimination. Institutional barriers to access identified included provider lack of knowledge and awareness of genetic services, lack of workforce, coordination of care, cost and insurance, and location from services. Conclusions: Barriers to access cut across overlapping dimensions and overcoming these barriers will require solutions that target multiple dimensions in order to be effective. Copyright (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 18
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   The future of genetic counselling: an international perspective [J].
Biesecker, BB ;
Marteau, TM .
NATURE GENETICS, 1999, 22 (02) :133-137
[2]   Genetic counseling gone awry: miscommunication between prenatal genetic service providers and Mexican-origin clients [J].
Browner, CH ;
Preloran, HM ;
Casado, MC ;
Bass, HN ;
Walker, AP .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 56 (09) :1933-1946
[3]   The genetic family history in internal medicine as a risk assessment tool [J].
Frezzo, TM ;
Rubinstein, WS ;
Dunham, D ;
Ormond, KE .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2003, 5 (02) :84-91
[4]   Telemedicine and clinical genetics: establishing a successful service [J].
Gattas, MR ;
MacMillan, JC ;
Meinecke, I ;
Loane, M ;
Wootton, R .
JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2001, 7 :68-70
[5]   A pilot study of telegenetics [J].
Gray, J ;
Brain, K ;
Iredale, R ;
Alderman, J ;
France, E ;
Hughes, H .
JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2000, 6 (04) :245-247
[6]   Genomic medicine - A primer [J].
Guttmacher, AE ;
Collins, FS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (19) :1512-1520
[7]   Sociocultural influences on participation in genetic risk assessment and testing among African American women [J].
Hughes, C ;
Fasaye, GA ;
LaSalle, VH ;
Finch, C .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2003, 51 (02) :107-114
[8]  
JOHNSON J, 2005, PREVENTING CHRONIC D
[9]   From genes to public health: The applications of genetic technology in disease prevention [J].
Khoury, MJ ;
Adams, M ;
Brown, V ;
Chen, ATL ;
Erickson, JD ;
Hannon, W ;
Mei, J ;
Moore, C ;
Mueller, P ;
Oakley, G ;
Olney, R ;
Ou, CY ;
Reidy, JA ;
Steinberg, K ;
Whitehead, N ;
Anda, RF ;
Ballew, C ;
Croft, JB ;
Giles, WH ;
Janes, G ;
Kendrick, J ;
Lee, NC ;
Eberhardt, M ;
McQuillan, G ;
Wagener, D ;
McNicholl, J ;
Rickles, F ;
Schulte, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1996, 86 (12) :1717-1722
[10]   Telegenetics in Maine: Successful clinical and educational service delivery model developed from a 3-year pilot project [J].
Lea, DH ;
Johnson, JL ;
Ellingwood, S ;
Allan, W ;
Patel, A ;
Smith, R .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 7 (01) :21-27