Use of metrics to quantify IMRT and VMAT treatment plan complexity: A systematic review and perspectives

被引:64
作者
Antoine, Mikael [1 ,2 ]
Ralite, Flavien [2 ,3 ]
Soustiel, Charles [4 ]
Marsac, Thomas [2 ]
Sargos, Paul [2 ]
Cugny, Audrey [2 ]
Caron, Jerome [2 ]
机构
[1] Polyclin Bordeaux Nord, Serv Oncoradiotherapie, 15 Rue Claude Boucher, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
[2] Inst Bergonie, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiotherapy, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
[3] Univ Nantes, CNRS, IN2P3, SUBATECH,IMT Atlantique, Nantes, France
[4] Ctr Hosp Dax, Dept Radiotherapy, Dax, France
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2019年 / 64卷
关键词
Modulation indices; Plan complexity; Volumetric modulated arc therapy; MULTIINSTITUTIONAL DOSIMETRY AUDIT; RADIATION-THERAPY IMRT; MODULATED ARC THERAPY; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; MULTILEAF COLLIMATOR; APERTURE COMPLEXITY; MULTICENTER AUDIT; RADIOTHERAPY; INDEX; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.05.024
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Fixed-field intensity modulated radiation therapy (FF-IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) beams complexity is due to fluence fluctuation. Pre-treatment Quality Assurance (PTQA) failure could be linked to it. Several plan complexity metrics (PCM) have been published to quantify this complexity but in a heterogeneous formalism. This review proposes to gather different PCM and to discuss their eventual PTQA failure identifier abilities. Methods and materials: A systematic literature search and outcome extraction from MEDLINE/PubMed (National Center for Biotechnology Information, NCBI) was performed. First, a list and a synthesis of available PCM is made in a homogeneous formalism. Second, main results relying on the link between PCM and PTQA results but also on other uses are listed. Results: A total of 163 studies were identified and n = 19 were selected after inclusion and exclusion criteria application. Difference is made between fluence and degree of freedom (DOF)-based PCM. Results about the PCM potential as PTQA failure identifier are described and synthesized. Others uses are also found in quality, big data, machine learning and audit procedure. Conclusions: A state of the art is made thanks to this homogeneous PCM classification. For now, PCM should be seen as a planning procedure quality indicator although PTQA failure identifier results are mitigated. However limited clinical use seems possible for some cases. Yet, addressing the general PTQA failure prediction case could be possible with the big data or machine learning help.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 108
页数:11
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Correlation of phantom-based and log file patient-specific QA with complexity scores for VMAT
    Agnew, Christina E.
    Irvine, Denise M.
    McGarry, Conor K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 15 (06): : 204 - 216
  • [2] Evaluation of fluence-smoothing feature for three IMRT planning systems
    Anker, Christopher J.
    Wang, Brian
    Tobler, Matt
    Chapek, Julie
    Shrieve, Dennis C.
    Hitchcock, Ying J.
    Salter, Bill J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 11 (02): : 33 - 61
  • [3] [Anonymous], PHYS MED
  • [4] [Anonymous], J ICRU
  • [5] [Anonymous], RADIOTHER ONCOL
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2007, COMPR AUD RAD PRACT
  • [7] [Anonymous], BR J RADIOL
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2014, J PHYS C SER
  • [9] An analysis of tolerance levels in IMRT quality assurance procedures
    Basran, Parminder S.
    Woo, Milton K.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06) : 2300 - 2307
  • [10] A national dosimetric audit of IMRT
    Budgell, Geoff
    Berresford, Joe
    Trainer, Michael
    Bradshaw, Ellie
    Sharpe, Peter
    Williams, Peter
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 (02) : 246 - 252