Exploring the exceptional performance of a deep learning stream temperature model and the value of streamflow data

被引:82
|
作者
Rahmani, Farshid [1 ]
Lawson, Kathryn [1 ]
Ouyang, Wenyu [2 ]
Appling, Alison [3 ]
Oliver, Samantha [4 ]
Shen, Chaopeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Civil & Environm Engn, State Coll, PA USA
[2] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Hydraul Engn, Dalian, Peoples R China
[3] US Geol Survey, Reston, VA 20192 USA
[4] US Geol Survey, Upper Midwest Water Sci Ctr, Middleton, WI USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
stream temperature; machine learning; streamflow; deep learning; LSTM; WATER TEMPERATURE; RIPARIAN VEGETATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; EQUIFINALITY; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/abd501
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Stream water temperature (T-s) is a variable of critical importance for aquatic ecosystem health. T-s is strongly affected by groundwater-surface water interactions which can be learned from streamflow records, but previously such information was challenging to effectively absorb with process-based models due to parameter equifinality. Based on the long short-term memory (LSTM) deep learning architecture, we developed a basin-centric lumped daily mean T-s model, which was trained over 118 data-rich basins with no major dams in the conterminous United States, and showed strong results. At a national scale, we obtained a median root-mean-square error of 0.69 degrees C, Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient of 0.985, and correlation of 0.994, which are marked improvements over previous values reported in literature. The addition of streamflow observations as a model input strongly elevated the performance of this model. In the absence of measured streamflow, we showed that a two-stage model could be used, where simulated streamflow from a pre-trained LSTM model (Q(sim)) still benefited the T-s model even though no new information was brought directly into the inputs of the T-s model. The model indirectly used information learned from streamflow observations provided during the training of Q(sim), potentially to improve internal representation of physically meaningful variables. Our results indicate that strong relationships exist between basin-averaged forcing variables, catchment attributes, and T-s that can be simulated by a single model trained by data on the continental scale.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deep learning approaches for improving prediction of daily stream temperature in data-scarce, unmonitored, and dammed basins
    Rahmani, Farshid
    Shen, Chaopeng
    Oliver, Samantha
    Lawson, Kathryn
    Appling, Alison
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2021, 35 (11)
  • [2] Using Deep Learning in Ensemble Streamflow Forecasting: Exploring the Predictive Value of Explicit Snowpack Information
    Modi, Parthkumar
    Jennings, Keith
    Kasprzyk, Joseph
    Small, Eric
    Wobus, Cameron
    Livneh, Ben
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2025, 17 (03)
  • [3] Combining Synthetic and Observed Data to Enhance Machine Learning Model Performance for Streamflow Prediction
    Lopez-Chacon, Sergio Ricardo
    Salazar, Fernando
    Blade, Ernest
    WATER, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [4] Monthly streamflow prediction and performance comparison of machine learning and deep learning methods
    Ayana, Omer
    Kanbak, Deniz Furkan
    Keles, Muemine Kaya
    Turhan, Evren
    ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2023, 71 (06) : 2905 - 2922
  • [5] Performance Improvement of LSTM-based Deep Learning Model for Streamflow Forecasting Using Kalman Filtering
    Ostadkalayeh, Fatemeh Bakhshi
    Moradi, Saba
    Asadi, Ali
    Nia, Alireza
    Taheri, Somayeh
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2023, 37 (08) : 3111 - 3127
  • [6] Performance Improvement of LSTM-based Deep Learning Model for Streamflow Forecasting Using Kalman Filtering
    Fatemeh Bakhshi Ostadkalayeh
    Saba Moradi
    Ali Asadi
    Alireza Moghaddam Nia
    Somayeh Taheri
    Water Resources Management, 2023, 37 : 3111 - 3127
  • [7] Performance evaluation of deep learning based stream nitrate concentration prediction model to fill stream nitrate data gaps at low-frequency nitrate monitoring basins
    Saha, Gourab
    Shen, Chaopeng
    Duncan, Jonathan
    Cibin, Raj
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 357
  • [8] Exploring Data Symbion EI Deep Learning and Model Sharing Modules
    Huszcza, Rafael
    Mendes, Amanda
    Lopes, Jeferson
    Borges, Eduardo N.
    Lucca, Giancarlo B.
    Guilherme, Pablo D. B.
    Pereira, Leandro A.
    INTELLIGENT DATA ENGINEERING AND AUTOMATED LEARNING - IDEAL 2024, PT II, 2025, 15347 : 349 - 360
  • [9] Monthly streamflow prediction and performance comparison of machine learning and deep learning methods
    Ömer Ayana
    Deniz Furkan Kanbak
    Mümine Kaya Keleş
    Evren Turhan
    Acta Geophysica, 2023, 71 : 2905 - 2922
  • [10] Multi-Task Deep Learning of Daily Streamflow and Water Temperature
    Sadler, J. M.
    Appling, A. P.
    Read, J. S.
    Oliver, S. K.
    Jia, X.
    Zwart, J. A.
    Kumar, V
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2022, 58 (04)