Material and design considerations of FBGA reliability performance

被引:2
|
作者
Lee, TK [1 ]
Ng, TC [1 ]
Chai, YM [1 ]
机构
[1] Micron Semiconductor Asia Pte Ltd, Singapore 339942, Singapore
关键词
interposer materials; soldermask; package reliability;
D O I
10.1016/j.tsf.2004.05.122
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
FBGA package reliability is usually assessed through the conventional approaches of die attach and mold compound material optimization. However, with the rapid changes and fast-moving pace of electronic packaging and the introduction of new soldermask and core materials, substrate design has also become a critical factor in determining overall package reliability. The purpose of this paper is to understand the impact design and soldermask material of a rigid substrate on overall package reliability. Three different soldermask patterns with a matrix of different die attach, mold compound, and soldermask materials are assessed using the moisture sensitivity test (MST). Package reliability is also assessed through the use of temperature cycling (T/C) at conditions "B" and "C." For material optimization, three different mold compounds and die attach materials are used. Material adhesion between different die attach materials and soldermask materials are obtained through die shear performed at various temperatures and preset moisture conditions. A study correlating the different packaging material properties and their relative adhesion strengths with overall package reliability in terms of both MST and T/C performance was performed. Soldermask design under the die pads was found to affect package reliability. For example, locating vias at the edge of the die is not desirable because the vias acts as initiation point for delamination and moisture-induced failure. Through die shear testing, soldermask B demonstrated higher adhesion properties compared to soldermask A across several packaging materials and enhanced the overall package reliability in terms of both MST and T/C performance. Both MST JEDEC level I and the T/C of "B" and "C" at 1000 cycles have been achieved through design and package material optimization. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 470
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Life cycle design of parts: Material and manufacturing considerations
    Hundal, MS
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE DESIGN 98, 1998, : 517 - 525
  • [42] CRYOGENIC LASER FUSION TARGET MATERIAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
    MILLER, JR
    FRIES, RJ
    PRESS, WJ
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS, 1979, 85-6 (DEC) : 121 - 125
  • [43] Material-flow considerations for the design of injection forging
    Balendra, R
    Qin, Y
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1997, 119 (03): : 350 - 357
  • [44] CERAMIC RAW MATERIAL AND PROCESS CONSIDERATIONS IN ENGINEERING DESIGN
    WHITTEMO.OJ
    ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 1970, 61 (01): : 59 - &
  • [45] MATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS IN STRUCTURAL-STEEL DESIGN - DISCUSSION
    STECICH, J
    ENGINEERING JOURNAL-AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION INC, 1990, 27 (01): : 36 - 36
  • [46] Material strength considerations in dimension stone anchorage design
    Lammert, Brian T.
    Hoigard, Kurt R.
    DIMENSION STONE USE IN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 1499 : 40 - 57
  • [47] PERFORMANCE AND FERRIMAGNETIC MATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS IN CRYOGENIC MICROWAVE DEVICES
    COMSTOCK, RL
    FAY, CE
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1965, 36 (3P2) : 1253 - +
  • [48] Cellulose-based Supercapacitors: Material and Performance Considerations
    Wang, Zhaohui
    Tammela, Petter
    Stromme, Maria
    Nyholm, Leif
    ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS, 2017, 7 (18)
  • [49] Power supply design for performance and reliability
    Shenai, K
    Singh, PJ
    Rao, S
    Sorenson, D
    Chu, K
    Gaylon, G
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE 2000 NATIONAL AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONICS CONFERENCE: ENGINEERING TOMORROW, 2000, : 524 - 531
  • [50] OPTIMIZATION OF SYSTEM RELIABILITY VIA REDUNDANCY AND-OR DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
    FRAIR, LC
    GHARE, PM
    FRAIR, KL
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 1980, 29 (01) : 33 - 35