Should Adenocarcinoma of Cervix be Treated Differently to Squamous Cell Carcinoma?

被引:0
作者
Lin, Ming Yin [1 ]
Rajasooriyar, Chrishanthi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Srinivas [1 ,4 ]
Narayan, Kailash [1 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol & Canc Imaging, Gynae Oncol Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Teaching Hosp, Jaffna, Sri Lanka
[3] Tellipalai Trail Canc Hosp, Jaffna, Sri Lanka
[4] Univ Queensland, Rural Clin Sch, Fac Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] ICON Canc Ctr, East Melbourne, Australia
关键词
Cervix cancer; Squamous carcinoma; Adenocarcinoma;
D O I
10.1007/s40944-021-00503-1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and patterns of failure, in patients with SCC and ADC of cervix treated with definitive radiotherapy and to determine whether ADC should be treated differently. Methods Total of 494 patients treated between January 1996 and December 2012 with definitive radiotherapy were included for analysis. Survival probabilities were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between the groups were compared using long-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the role of histology after adjusting for potential confounders impacting on survival. Results The 5-year RFS of node-negative SCC and ADC was 79% and 75% and of node-positive SCC and ADC was 51% and 37%, respectively. The 5-year OS was 74% for both node-negative SCC and ADC and 54% and 42% for node-positive SCC and ADC, respectively. This difference in RFS and OS among these four subgroups was not significant. The tumour volume (p = 0.005), corpus invasion (p = 0.022) and lymph node involvement (p < 0.001) were significant predictors of RFS, whereas histology (p = 0.204) was not. Increasing age (p < 0.001), ECOG performance score 2 (p = 0.04), tumour volume (p = 0.009) and lymph node involvement (p < 0.001) were predictive for OS, but histology (p = 0.458) was not. There was no difference in pelvic and extra-pelvic failure of the two histological subtypes. Conclusion Both these histological types exhibit similar clinical behaviour and survival when matched for prognostic factors. Hence, current standard of care was equally effective in both histological types.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Apoptosis and the expression of Bax and Bcl-2 in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix
    Kokawa, K
    Shikone, T
    Otani, T
    Nakano, R
    CANCER, 1999, 85 (08) : 1799 - 1809
  • [22] In situ adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma of uterine cervix - Pathological and immunohistochemical analysis with cytokeratin 13
    Raspollini, Maria Rosaria
    Fambrini, Massimiliano
    Marchionni, Mauro
    Baroni, Gianna
    Taddei, Gian Luigi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2007, 134 (02): : 249 - 253
  • [23] Differences Between Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma of the Lung: Are Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma Prognostically Equal?
    Kawase, Akikazu
    Yoshida, Junji
    Ishii, Genichiro
    Nakao, Masayuki
    Aokage, Keiju
    Hishida, Tomoyuki
    Nishimura, Mitsuyo
    Nagai, Kanji
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 42 (03) : 189 - 195
  • [24] Comparison of survival outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix after radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy
    Liu, Ping
    Ji, Mei
    Kong, Yanxiang
    Huo, Zhifeng
    Lv, Qiubo
    Xie, Qinghuang
    Wang, Danbo
    Chen, Biliang
    Wang, Hailin
    Cui, Zhumei
    Wang, Qianqing
    Bin, Xiaonong
    Lang, Jinghe
    Chen, Chunlin
    BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [25] Sonographic characteristics of squamous cell cancer and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix
    Epstein, E.
    Di Legge, A.
    Masback, A.
    Lindqvist, P. G.
    Kannisto, P.
    Testa, A. C.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 36 (04) : 512 - 516
  • [26] COMPARISON OF ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVE USE IN WOMEN WITH ADENOCARCINOMA AND SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE UTERINE CERVIX
    HONORE, LH
    KOCH, M
    BROWN, LB
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 1991, 32 (02) : 98 - 101
  • [27] What is the difference between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix? A matched case-control study
    Lee, K. Bm.
    Lee, J. M.
    Park, C. Y.
    Lee, K. B.
    Cho, H. Y.
    Ha, S. Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2006, 16 (04) : 1569 - 1573
  • [28] Comparison of survival outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix after radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy
    Ping Liu
    Mei Ji
    Yanxiang Kong
    Zhifeng Huo
    Qiubo Lv
    Qinghuang Xie
    Danbo Wang
    Biliang Chen
    Hailin Wang
    Zhumei Cui
    Qianqing Wang
    Xiaonong Bin
    Jinghe Lang
    Chunlin Chen
    BMC Cancer, 22
  • [29] Human papillomavirus DNA in uterine cervix squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma detected by polymerase chain reaction
    Iwasawa, A
    Nieminen, P
    Lehtinen, M
    Paavonen, J
    CANCER, 1996, 77 (11) : 2275 - 2279
  • [30] DISTINCTION BETWEEN ADENOCARCINOMA AND SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
    Kerr, Keith M.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 6 (06) : S156 - S157