Kinetics of BTEX degradation in a packed-bed anaerobic reactor

被引:10
|
作者
deNardi, Ivana Ribeiro
Zaiat, Marcelo
Foresti, Eugenio
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Escola Engn Sao Carlos, Lab Proc Biol, BR-13566590 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[2] Ctr Univ Cent Paulista, BR-13563470 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
anaerobic process; BTEX; fixed-bed reactor; immobilized biomass; kinetic parameters; polyurethane foam;
D O I
10.1007/s10532-005-9038-2
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The ever-increasing diversity of industrial activity is responsible for the discharge of compounds that are toxic or difficult to degrade into the environment. Some of the compounds found in surface and ground waters, usually deriving from the contamination of oil-based products, are benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX). To remove these compounds from contaminated water, a bench-scale horizontal-flow anaerobic immobilized biomass reactor, containing anaerobic biomass from various sources immobilized in polyurethane foam matrices, was employed to treat a synthetic substrate composed of protein, carbohydrates and BTEX solution in ethanol, as well as a BTEX solution in ethanol as the sole carbon source. The reactor removed up to 15.0 mg/l of each BTEX compound over a hydraulic detention time of 11.4 h. A first-order kinetic model fitted the experimental data well, showing correlation coefficients higher than 0.994. The apparent first-order coefficient values, k(1)(app), ranged from 8.4 +/- 1.5 day(-1) for benzene to 10.7 +/- 1.4 day(-1) for o-xylene in the presence of ethanol, protein and carbohydrates, and from 10.0 +/- 2.0 day(-1) for benzene to 13.0 +/- 1.7 day(-1) for o-xylene in the presence of ethanol. The BTEX degradation rates estimated here were 10- to 94-fold higher than those found in reports on microcosm studies.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 90
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SIMULATION OF AN ADIABATIC PACKED-BED REACTOR
    KARANTH, NG
    HUGHES, R
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1974, 29 (01) : 197 - 205
  • [22] Sulphate removal from industrial wastewater using a packed-bed anaerobic reactor
    Silva, AJ
    Varesche, MB
    Foresti, E
    Zaiat, M
    PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 37 (09) : 927 - 935
  • [23] Effect of Bed Configuration on Dispersion in a Packed-Bed Reactor
    Gupta, Renu
    Bansal, Ajay
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2010, 49 (19) : 9525 - 9528
  • [24] OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ANAEROBIC PACKED-BED REACTORS
    YOUNG, JC
    DAHAB, MF
    BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 1982, : 303 - 316
  • [25] Use of a packed-bed airlift reactor with net draft tube to study kinetics of naphthalene degradation by Ralstonia eutropha
    Jalilnejad, Elham
    Vahabzadeh, Farzaneh
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2014, 21 (06) : 4592 - 4604
  • [26] Use of a packed-bed airlift reactor with net draft tube to study kinetics of naphthalene degradation by Ralstonia eutropha
    Elham Jalilnejad
    Farzaneh Vahabzadeh
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2014, 21 : 4592 - 4604
  • [27] A Novel Packed-bed Electrocatalysis Reactor (PBECR) for Efficient Degradation of Organic Compounds
    Li, Peng
    Zhao, Yuemin
    Wang, Lizhang
    Ding, Binbin
    Hu, Yunlong
    Yan, Qian
    ELECTROCHEMISTRY, 2014, 82 (12) : 1056 - 1060
  • [28] Assessing the treatment of acetaminophen-contaminated brewery wastewater by an anaerobic packed-bed reactor
    Abdullah, Norhayati
    Fulazzaky, Mohamad Ali
    Yong, Ee Ling
    Yuzir, Ali
    Sallis, Paul
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 168 : 273 - 279
  • [29] Effects of anions on the photocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic degradation of reactive dye in a packed-bed reactor
    Zhang, WB
    An, TC
    Cui, MC
    Sheng, GY
    Fu, JM
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2005, 80 (02) : 223 - 229
  • [30] Comparative performance of a UASB reactor and an anaerobic packed-bed reactor when treating potato waste leachate
    Parawira, W
    Murto, M
    Zvauya, R
    Mattiasson, B
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2006, 31 (06) : 893 - 903