Performance measurement for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders

被引:4
作者
Dausey, David J. [1 ,2 ]
Pincus, Harold A. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Herrell, James M. [6 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] RAND Corp, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY 10032 USA
[4] New York Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY 10032 USA
[5] Irving Ctr Clin & Translat Res, New York, NY 10032 USA
[6] CSAT, SAMHSA, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
来源
SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PREVENTION AND POLICY | 2009年 / 4卷
关键词
PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE; CARE; QUALITY; ACCOUNTABILITY; OUTCOMES; SYSTEMS; ABUSE;
D O I
10.1186/1747-597X-4-18
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders (COD) are the norm rather than the exception. It is therefore critical that performance measures are developed to assess the quality of care for individuals with COD irrespective of whether they seek care in mental health systems or substance abuse systems or both. Methods: We convened an expert panel and asked them to rate a series of structure, process, and outcomes measures for COD using a structured evaluation tool with domains for importance, usefulness, validity, and practicality. Results: We chose twelve measures that demonstrated promise for future pilot testing and refinement. The criteria that we applied to select these measures included: balance across structure, process, and outcome measures, quantitative ratings from the panelists, narrative comments from the panelists, and evidence the measure had been tested in a similar form elsewhere. Conclusion: To be successful performance measures need to be developed in such a way that they align with needs of administrators and providers. Policymakers need to work with all stakeholders to establish a concrete agenda for developing, piloting and implementing performance measures that include COD. Future research could begin to consider strategies that increase our ability to use administrative coding in mental health and substance use disorder systems to efficiently capture quality relevant clinical data.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[11]  
HUNSICKER RJ, 2007, BEHAV HEALTHC, V27, P48
[12]  
HURTADO P, 2001, ENVISIONING NATL HLT
[13]   Snapshot of hospital quality reporting and pay-for-performance under Medicare [J].
Kahn, CN ;
Ault, T ;
Isenstein, H ;
Potetz, L ;
Van Gelder, S .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2006, 25 (01) :148-162
[14]   Using Health Information Technology-Related Performance Measures and Tools to Improve Chronic Care [J].
Keyser, Donna J. ;
Dembosky, Jacob W. ;
Kmetik, Karen ;
Antman, Mark S. ;
Sirio, Carl A. ;
Farley, Donna O. .
JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2009, 35 (05) :248-255
[15]  
KILBOURNE AM, 2009, QUAL SAF HL IN PRESS
[16]   Pay for performance, version 2.0? [J].
Lee, Thomas H. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (06) :531-533
[17]  
McCorry F, 2000, Jt Comm J Qual Improv, V26, P633
[18]   Fidelity outcomes in the national implementing evidence-based practices project [J].
McHugo, Gregory J. ;
Drake, Robert E. ;
Whitley, Rob ;
Bond, Gary R. ;
Campbell, Kikuko ;
Rapp, Charles A. ;
Goldman, Howard H. ;
Lutz, Wilma J. ;
Finnerty, Molly T. .
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2007, 58 (10) :1279-1284
[19]   Outcomes, performance, and quality - What's the difference? [J].
McLellan, A. Thomas ;
Chalk, Mady ;
Bartlett, John .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2007, 32 (04) :331-340
[20]   Quality measurement and accountability for substance abuse and mental health services in managed care organizations [J].
Merrick, EL ;
Garnick, DW ;
Horgan, CM ;
Hodgkin, D .
MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (12) :1238-1248