Modelling Daily Gross Primary Productivity with Sentinel-2 Data in the Nordic Region-Comparison with Data from MODIS

被引:17
作者
Cai, Zhanzhang [1 ]
Junttila, Sofia [1 ]
Holst, Jutta [1 ]
Jin, Hongxiao [1 ,2 ]
Ardo, Jonas [1 ]
Ibrom, Andreas [2 ]
Peichl, Matthias [3 ]
Molder, Meelis [1 ]
Jonsson, Per [4 ]
Rinne, Janne [1 ]
Karamihalaki, Maria [1 ]
Eklundh, Lars [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Phys Geog & Ecosyst Sci, Solvegatan 12, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Environm Engn, Bygningstorvet 115, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Ecol & Management, SE-90183 Umea, Sweden
[4] Malmo Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Appl Math, SE-20506 Malmo, Sweden
关键词
gross primary productivity; Sentinel-2; MSI; EVI2; MODIS; Nordic region; LIGHT-USE EFFICIENCY; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; FLUX MEASUREMENTS; CARBON BALANCE; FOREST; GPP; CO2; VALIDATION; VEGETATION; FOOTPRINT;
D O I
10.3390/rs13030469
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The high-resolution Sentinel-2 data potentially enable the estimation of gross primary productivity (GPP) at finer spatial resolution by better capturing the spatial variation in a heterogeneous landscapes. This study investigates the potential of 10 m resolution reflectance from the Sentinel-2 Multispectral Instrument to improve the accuracy of GPP estimation across Nordic vegetation types, compared with the 250 m and 500 m resolution reflectance from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). We applied linear regression models with inputs of two-band enhanced vegetation index (EVI2) derived from Sentinel-2 and MODIS reflectance, respectively, together with various environmental drivers to estimate daily GPP at eight Nordic eddy covariance (EC) flux tower sites. Compared with the GPP from EC measurements, the accuracies of modelled GPP were generally high (R-2 = 0.84 for Sentinel-2; R-2 = 0.83 for MODIS), and the differences between Sentinel-2 and MODIS were minimal. This demonstrates the general consistency in GPP estimates based on the two satellite sensor systems at the Nordic regional scale. On the other hand, the model accuracy did not improve by using the higher spatial-resolution Sentinel-2 data. More analyses of different model formulations, more tests of remotely sensed indices and biophysical parameters, and analyses across a wider range of geographical locations and times will be required to achieve improved GPP estimations from Sentinel-2 satellite data.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [41] Effects of canopy photosynthesis saturation on the estimation of gross primary productivity from MODIS data in a tropical forest
    Propastin, P.
    Ibrom, A.
    Knohl, A.
    Erasmi, S.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 121 : 252 - 260
  • [42] ICOS eddy covariance flux-station site setup: a review
    Rebmann, Corinna
    Aubinet, Marc
    Schmid, Hape
    Arriga, Nicola
    Aurela, Mika
    Burba, George
    Clement, Robert
    De Ligne, Anne
    Fratini, Gerardo
    Gielen, Bert
    Grace, John
    Graf, Alexander
    Gross, Patrick
    Haapanala, Sami
    Herbst, Mathias
    Hortnagl, Lukas
    Ibrom, Andreas
    Joly, Lilian
    Kljun, Natascha
    Kolle, Olaf
    Kowalski, Andrew
    Lindroth, Anders
    Loustau, Denis
    Mammarella, Ivan
    Mauder, Matthias
    Merbold, Lutz
    Metzger, Stefan
    Molder, Meelis
    Montagnani, Leonardo
    Papale, Dario
    Pavelka, Marian
    Peichl, Matthias
    Roland, Marilyn
    Serrano-Ortiz, Penelope
    Siebicke, Lukas
    Steinbrecher, Rainer
    Tuovinen, Juha-Pekka
    Vesala, Timo
    Wohlfahrt, Georg
    Franz, Daniela
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL AGROPHYSICS, 2018, 32 (04) : 471 - +
  • [43] Does the temperature sensitivity of decomposition of soil organic matter depend upon water content, soil horizon, or incubation time?
    Reichstein, M
    Subke, JA
    Angeli, AC
    Tenhunen, JD
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2005, 11 (10) : 1754 - 1767
  • [44] Running SW, 2004, BIOSCIENCE, V54, P547, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0547:ACSMOG]2.0.CO
  • [45] 2
  • [46] Eddy covariance raw data processing for CO2 and energy fluxes calculation at ICOS ecosystem stations
    Sabbatini, Simone
    Mammarella, Ivan
    Arriga, Nicola
    Fratini, Gerardo
    Graf, Alexander
    Hoertriagl, Lukas
    Ibrom, Andreas
    Longdoz, Bernard
    Mauder, Matthias
    Merbold, Lutz
    Metzger, Stefan
    Montagnani, Leonardo
    Pitacco, Andrea
    Rebmann, Corinna
    Sedlak, Pavel
    Sigut, Ladislav
    Vitale, Domenico
    Papale, Dario
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL AGROPHYSICS, 2018, 32 (04) : 495 - +
  • [47] Comparing terrestrial carbon fluxes from the scale of a flux tower to the global scale
    Sasai, T.
    Okamoto, K.
    Hiyama, T.
    Yamaguchi, Y.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2007, 208 (2-4) : 135 - 144
  • [49] Comparison of chamber and eddy covariance-based CO2 and CH4 emission estimates in a heterogeneous grass ecosystem on peat
    Schrier-Uijl, A. P.
    Kroon, P. S.
    Hensen, A.
    Leffelaar, P. A.
    Berendse, F.
    Veenendaal, E. M.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2010, 150 (06) : 825 - 831
  • [50] Modeling GPP in the Nordic forest landscape with MODIS time series data-Comparison with the MODIS GPP product
    Schubert, Per
    Lagergren, Fredrik
    Aurela, Mika
    Christensen, Torben
    Grelle, Achim
    Heliasz, Michal
    Klemedtsson, Leif
    Lindroth, Anders
    Pilegaard, Kim
    Vesala, Timo
    Eklundh, Lars
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 126 : 136 - 147