Cost Effectiveness of Varenicline in Belgium, Compared with Bupropion, Nicotine Replacement Therapy, Brief Counselling and Unaided Smoking Cessation A BENESCO Markov Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

被引:35
作者
Annemans, Lieven [1 ]
Nackaerts, Kristiaan [2 ]
Bartsch, Pierre [3 ]
Prignot, Jacques [4 ]
Marbaix, Sophie [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Publ Hlth, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Pulmonol, Resp Oncol Unit, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Univ Hosp, Dept Pneumol, Liege, Belgium
[4] Catholic Univ Louvain, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[5] Pfizer, Dept Market Access & Pricing & Reimbursement, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
SUSTAINED-RELEASE BUPROPION; RECEPTOR PARTIAL AGONIST; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; UNITED-STATES; UTILITY; HEALTH; INTERVENTIONS; PREVENTION; DISEASE; SMOKERS;
D O I
10.2165/11317730-000000000-00000
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background and Objective: Varenicline is a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist that is approved for use as an aid to smoking cessation. Randomized clinical trials show that its efficacy is superior to that of other current smoking cessation therapies. This study set out to determine the cost effectiveness of varenicline relative to other smoking cessation interventions (bupropion and nicotine replacement therapy [NRT]) as well as brief counselling alone and unaided cessation in a cohort of Belgian adult smokers making a one-time quit attempt, from the perspective of the healthcare payer (public and private). Methods: A Markov model, the Benefits of Smoking Cessation on Outcomes (BENESCO) model, was applied to calculate the long-term health and economic benefits of smoking cessation. Cost effectiveness was expressed as cost per life-year (LY) gained and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Clinical and economic model inputs were obtained from the literature and public healthcare databases. Costs were discounted at 3% and health outcomes at 1.5%. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis and a one-way sensitivity analysis were performed to test the robustness of the results. Results: Varenicline is associated with a reduction of smoking-related morbidity and mortality as well as with a decrease in healthcare costs compared with the pharmacological agents bupropion and NRT. Varenicline also leads to additional LYs and QALYs compared with brief counselling alone and unaided cessation over a lifetime period. Varenicline is a dominant strategy compared with bupropion and NRT. Compared with brief counselling alone and unaided cessation, varenicline presents a cost/QALY of (sic)240 and (sic)1656, respectively. Conclusion: Varenicline is a cost-effective alternative to brief counselling and unaided cessation, and is a cost-saving treatment in comparison with bupropion and NRT, in a Belgian population of smokers willing to quit.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 665
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, KOSTEN ZIEKTEN NEDER
  • [2] CAEKELBERGH K, 2005, ISPOR 8 ANN EUR C NO
  • [3] Cahill K, 2013, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub6, 10.1002/14651858.CD009329.pub2]
  • [4] Cigarette smoking and ozone-associated emergency department use for asthma by adults in New York City
    Cassino, C
    Ito, K
    Bader, I
    Ciotoli, C
    Thurston, G
    Reibman, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 159 (06) : 1773 - 1779
  • [5] CLEEMPUT I, 2008, RICHTLIJNEN FARMACO, pB78
  • [6] DEMAREST S, 2004, HLTH REV SURVEY
  • [7] DEMOTTE R, 2003, FEDERAAL PLAN TER BE
  • [8] Defining post-stroke recovery: implications for design and interpretation of drug trials
    Duncan, PW
    Lai, SM
    Keighley, J
    [J]. NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 39 (05) : 835 - 841
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness of face-to-face smoking cessation interventions:: A dynamic modeling study
    Feenstra, TL
    Hamberg-van Reenen, HH
    Hoogenveen, RT
    Rutten-van Mölken, MPMH
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2005, 8 (03) : 178 - 190
  • [10] Foulds Jonathan, 2004, Expert Opin Emerg Drugs, V9, P39, DOI 10.1517/14728214.9.1.39