How to decide which patient-reported outcome measure to use? A practical guide for plastic surgeons

被引:17
|
作者
Dobbs, Thomas D. [1 ,2 ]
Hughes, Sarah [3 ,4 ]
Mowbray, Nicholas [3 ]
Hutchings, Hayley A. [3 ]
Whitaker, Iain S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Swansea Univ Med Sch, Inst Life Sci, Reconstruct Surg & Regenerat Med Res Grp, Singleton Campus, Swansea SA2 8PP, W Glam, Wales
[2] Morriston Hosp, Welsh Ctr Burns & Plast, Swansea SA6 6NL, W Glam, Wales
[3] Swansea Univ Med Sch, Inst Life Sci, Hlth Serv Res, Singleton Campus, Swansea SA2 8PP, W Glam, Wales
[4] Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Univ Hlth Board, Princess Wales Hosp, Coity Rd, Bridgend CF31 1RQ, Wales
关键词
Patient-reported outcome measures; PROM; Plastic surgery; Reconstructive surgery; Guide; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; HEALTH-STATUS; SKIN-CANCER; VALIDITY; RESPONSIVENESS; INSTRUMENTS; INDEX; CRITERIA; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2018.03.007
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The use of patient-reported outcome measures ( PROMs) is increasing across all medical specialties, as their importance to patient care is validated. They are likely to play a particularly important role in plastic and reconstructive surgery where outcomes are often subjective, and the recent guidance from the Royal College of Surgeons of England advising their use in cosmetic surgery highlights this. To drive their routine use across our specialty, it is important that clinicians are capable of understanding the often complex and confusing language that surrounds their design and validation. In this article, we describe the process of PROM design and validation, and we attempt to 'demystify' the language used in the health outcome literature. We present the important steps that a well-designed PROM must go through and suggest a straightforward guide for selecting the most appropriate PROMs for use in clinical practice. We hope that this will encourage greater use of PROM data across plastic and reconstructive surgery and ultimately help improve outcomes for our patients. (C) 2018 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:957 / 966
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A perspective on the use of patient-reported experience and patient-reported outcome measures in ambulatory healthcare
    Hays, Ron D.
    Quigley, Denise D.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2025, : 441 - 449
  • [42] Evaluating cancer patient-reported outcome measures: Readability and implications for clinical use
    Papadakos, Janet K.
    Charow, Rebecca C.
    Papadakos, Christine J.
    Moody, Lesley J.
    Giuliani, Meredith E.
    CANCER, 2019, 125 (08) : 1350 - 1356
  • [43] Psychometric evaluation of the Urgency NRS as a new patient-reported outcome measure for patients with ulcerative colitis
    Dubinsky, Marla C.
    Shan, Mingyang
    Delbecque, Laure
    Lissoos, Trevor
    Hunter, Theresa
    Harding, Gale
    Stassek, Larissa
    Andrae, David
    Lewis, James D.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2022, 6 (01)
  • [44] The French-Canadian validation of a disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure for lupus
    Bourre-Tessier, J.
    Clarke, A. E.
    Kosinski, M.
    Mikolaitis-Preuss, R. A.
    Bernatsky, S.
    Block, J. A.
    Jolly, M.
    LUPUS, 2014, 23 (14) : 1452 - 1459
  • [45] Evaluation of Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life questionnaire: responsiveness of a new patient-reported outcome measure
    Packham, Jon C.
    Jordan, Kelvin P.
    Haywood, Kirstie L.
    Garratt, Andrew M.
    Healey, Emma L.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2012, 51 (04) : 707 - 714
  • [46] Readability of Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaires for Use With Persons With Dysphonia
    Zraick, Richard I.
    Atcherson, Samuel R.
    JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2012, 26 (05) : 635 - 641
  • [47] Danish translation and linguistic validation of the GENDER-Q, a patient-reported outcome measure for use in gender-affirming care
    Igbokwe, Michelle Mistry
    Poulsen, Lotte
    Taulbjerg Kristensen, Tine
    Klassen, Anne F.
    Kaur, Manraj N.
    Breitkopf, Trisia
    Graesser, Jack
    Holmgaard, Rikke
    Sorensen, Jens Ahm
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2025, 48 (01)
  • [48] The Suprasellar Meningioma Patient-Reported Outcome Survey: a disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure for resection of suprasellar meningioma
    Khalafallah, Adham M.
    Rakovec, Maureen
    Burapachaisri, Katemanee
    Fung, Shirley
    Kozachik, Sharon L.
    Valappil, Benita
    Abou-Al-Shaar, Hussam
    Wang, Eric W.
    Snyderman, Carl H.
    Zenonos, Georgios A.
    Gardner, Paul A.
    Baskaya, Mustafa K.
    Dornbos, David I. I. I. I. I. I.
    Choby, Garret
    Kuan, Edward C.
    Roxbury, Christopher
    Overdevest, Jonathan B.
    Gudis, David A.
    Lee, Victoria S.
    Levy, Joshua M.
    Thamboo, Andrew
    Schlosser, Rodney J.
    Huang, Judy
    Bettegowda, Chetan
    London, Nyall R. Jr Jr
    Rowan, Nicholas R.
    Wu, Albert W.
    Mukherjee, Debraj
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 136 (06) : 1551 - 1559
  • [49] Patient reported outcome measures in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Which to use?
    Ekstrom, Magnus
    Sundh, Josefin
    Larsson, Kjell
    EXPERT REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 10 (03) : 351 - 362
  • [50] A patient-reported outcome measure for patients with pituitary adenoma undergoing transsphenoidal surgery
    Elika Karvandi
    John Gerrard Hanrahan
    Danyal Zaman Khan
    Pierre-Marc Boloux
    Fion Bremner
    Ivan Cabrilo
    Neil Dorward
    Joan Grieve
    Sue Jackson
    Glenda Jimenez
    Inma Serrano
    Victoria Anne Nowak
    Angelos Kolias
    Stephanie E. Baldeweg
    Hani Joseph Marcus
    Pituitary, 2022, 25 : 673 - 683