Effective policy instrument mixes for implementing integrated flood risk management: An analysis of the 'Room for the River' program

被引:22
作者
Verweij, Stefan [1 ]
Busscher, Tim [1 ]
van den Brink, Margo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Fac Spatial Sci, Dept Spatial Planning & Environm, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Integrated flood risk management; Water management; Spatial planning; Project implementation; Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA); Room for the River; WATER MANAGEMENT; TRANSITIONS; LANDSCAPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Central to integrated flood risk management is the integration of water management with spatial planning. Existing studies often focus on analyzing the policy instruments in the initiation and planning phases of integrated flood risk management. Little is known, however, about the policy instrument mixes that enable implementation of integrated flood risk management. Therefore, in this article we analyze the Dutch Room for the River program to identify what mixes of policy instruments enable successful integrated flood risk management in the implementation phase. We collected archival and survey data and analyzed 19 implemented projects in the Room for the River program applying Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). We conclude that no single policy instrument is necessary or sufficient for successful implementation. We found three policy instrument mixes: an integrated contract mix, a project management mix, and an outside-government mix.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 212
页数:9
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, PROCESEVALUATIE RUIM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, TUSSENEVALUATIE PKB
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CONFIGURATIONAL COMP
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, PLAN KERNB RUIMT RIV
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, SAGE HDB CASE BASED
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ORGANISEREN RUIMTELI
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2015, RUIMT INN STAPSG MET
[8]  
Bemelmans-Videc Marie-Louise., 2011, CARROTS STICKS SERMO
[9]  
Brouwer J, 2017, ARCHITECTUURNL, P44
[10]  
Busscher T, 2019, STRATEGIES INTEGRATI