Consensus networks with time-delays over finite fields

被引:25
|
作者
Li, Xiuxian [1 ]
Su, Housheng [2 ]
Chen, Michael Z. Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Mech Engn, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Automat, Educ Minist China, Image Proc & Intelligent Control Key Lab, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
关键词
time-delays; average consensus; finite fields; networks; Consensus; LEADER-FOLLOWING CONSENSUS; MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS; INPUT SATURATION; ALGORITHMS; FLOCKING; AGENTS;
D O I
10.1080/00207179.2015.1110755
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this paper, we investigate the consensus problem in networks with time-delays over finite fields. The delays are categorised into three cases: single constant delay, multiple constant delays, and time-varying bounded delays. For all cases, some sufficient and necessary conditions for consensus are derived. Furthermore, assuming that the communication graph is strongly connected, some of the obtained necessary conditions reveal that the conditions for consensus with time-delays over finite fields depend not only on the diagonal entries but also on the off-diagonal entries, something that is intrinsically distinct from the case over real numbers (where having at least one nonzero diagonal entry is a sufficient and necessary condition to guarantee consensus). In addition, it is shown that delayed networks cannot achieve consensus when the interaction graph is a tree if the corresponding delay-free networks cannot reach consensus, which is consistent with the result over real numbers. As for average consensus, we show that it can never be achieved for delayed networks over finite fields, although it indeed can be reached under several conditions for delay-free networks over finite fields. Finally, networks with time-varying delays are discussed and one sufficient condition for consensus is presented by graph-theoretic method.
引用
收藏
页码:1000 / 1008
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Consensus networks with switching topology and time-delays over finite fields
    Li, Xiuxian
    Chen, Michael Z. Q.
    Su, Housheng
    Li, Chanying
    AUTOMATICA, 2016, 68 : 39 - 43
  • [2] Leader-following consensus of finite-field networks with time-delays
    Zhu, Wanjie
    Cao, Jinde
    Shi, Xinli
    Rutkowski, Leszek
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2023, 647
  • [3] Robust Consensus of Multi-Agent Systems with Time-Delays and Exogenous Disturbances
    Yang, Hong-yong
    Guo, Lei
    Zou, Hai-lin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL AUTOMATION AND SYSTEMS, 2012, 10 (04) : 797 - 805
  • [4] Consensus Control for Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Formation Systems with Time-Delays
    Jia, Xiao
    Zhang, Guo-Liang
    Xu, Jun
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND AUTOMATION CONTROL (ICEEAC 2017), 2017, 123 : 430 - 437
  • [5] Sampled-data-based consensus of multi-agent systems with multiplicative noise and time-delays
    Zhang, Kewei
    Zhang, Yuanyuan
    Li, Renfu
    Chen, Guanrong
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2022, 609 : 1621 - 1640
  • [6] Consensus networks over finite fields
    Pasqualetti, Fabio
    Borra, Dornenica
    Bullo, Francesco
    AUTOMATICA, 2014, 50 (02) : 349 - 358
  • [7] Consensus in Networks of Nonidentical Euler-Lagrange Systems with Variable Time-Delays
    Nuno, Emmanuel
    Sarras, Ioannis
    Panteley, Elena
    Basanez, Luis
    2012 IEEE 51ST ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2012, : 4721 - 4726
  • [8] Multi-agent consensus with diverse time-delays and jointly-connected topologies
    Lin, Peng
    Jia, Yingmin
    AUTOMATICA, 2011, 47 (04) : 848 - 856
  • [9] Task space consensus in networks of heterogeneous and uncertain robotic systems with variable time-delays
    Nuno, Emmanuel
    Aldana, Carlos I.
    Basanez, Luis
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADAPTIVE CONTROL AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2017, 31 (06) : 917 - 937
  • [10] Global Bounded Consensus of General Nonidentical Networks With Distributed Time-Delays
    Li, Xiuxian
    Su, Housheng
    Li, Chanying
    Wang, Zheng
    Chen, Michael Z. Q.
    2015 54TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2015, : 6868 - 6873