Robotic-assisted surgery for low rectal dissection: from better views to better outcome

被引:1
作者
Ng, K. H. [1 ]
Lim, Y. K. [1 ]
Ho, K. S. [1 ]
Ooi, B. S. [1 ]
Eu, K. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Singapore 169608, Singapore
关键词
da Vinci robotics; laparoscopic surgery; rectal cancer; robotic surgery; total mesorectal excision; LAPAROSCOPIC COLORECTAL SURGERY; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; GENERAL-SURGERY; CANCER; EXPERIENCE; COLECTOMY; COLON;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The use of robotics in colorectal surgery is relatively new. The first few cases of colonic surgery using da Vinci Surgical System were reported in 2002. Since then, several centres had reported on their experience, with favourable outcomes. Our department started to embark on robotics in colorectal surgery in December 2007. The aim of our paper was to share our early experience with robotics in colorectal surgery and provide an update on the current status of robotics. Methods: Preparations included formal training with the da Vinci Surgical System, certification of the surgeons, and obtaining Hospital Ethics committee approval. We used a hybrid technique of laparoscopic and robotic assistance in the resection of mid-to low-rectal cancer ( total mesorectal excision). Laparoscopic approach was used to isolate the inferior mesenteric artery and for mobilisation of the left colon. The da Vinci robot was used in the dissection of the rectum down to the pelvic floor. We reviewed the outcomes of our early experience with emphasis on feasibility and safety. Results: Over a period of three months, we performed eight cases of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery for cancer. The median age of the patients was 55 (range 42-80) years. The median operating time was 192.5 (range 145-250) minutes. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications related to the use of robotics. The median length of hospital stay was five (range 4-30) days. Conclusion: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery is a safe and feasible procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 767
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Focus on Extralevator Perineal Dissection in Supine Position for Low Rectal Cancer Has Led to Better Quality of Surgery and Oncologic Outcome [J].
Martijnse, Ingrid S. ;
Dudink, Ralph L. ;
West, Nicholas P. ;
Wasowicz, Dareczka ;
Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard A. ;
van Lijnschoten, Ineke ;
Martijn, Hendrik ;
Lemmens, Valery E. ;
van de Velde, Cornelis J. ;
Nagtegaal, Iris D. ;
Quirke, Phil ;
Rutten, Harm J. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (03) :786-793
[22]   Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for lower rectal cancer [J].
Morohashi, Hajime ;
Sakamoto, Yoshiyuki ;
Miura, Takuya ;
Ichinohe, Daichi ;
Kubota, Shunsuke ;
Yamazaki, Keisuke ;
Ichisawa, Aika ;
Mitsuhashi, Yuto ;
Wakiya, Taiichi ;
Hakamada, Kenichi .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2022, 15 (03) :577-584
[23]   Does prolonged operative time impact postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing robotic-assisted rectal resection for cancer? [J].
Duchalais, E. ;
Machairas, N. ;
Kelley, S. R. ;
Landmann, R. G. ;
Merchea, A. ;
Colibaseanu, D. T. ;
Mathis, K. L. ;
Dozois, E. J. ;
Larson, D. W. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (08) :3659-3666
[24]   Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced low rectal cancer [J].
Yamaguchi, Tomohiro ;
Kinugasa, Yusuke ;
Shiomi, Akio ;
Kagawa, Hiroyasu ;
Yamakawa, Yushi ;
Furutani, Akinobu ;
Manabe, Shoichi ;
Yamaoka, Yusuke ;
Hino, Hitoshi .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (11) :4498-4505
[25]   An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer [J].
Collinson, Fiona J. ;
Jayne, David G. ;
Pigazzi, Alessio ;
Tsang, Charles ;
Barrie, Jennifer M. ;
Edlin, Richard ;
Garbett, Christopher ;
Guillou, Pierre ;
Holloway, Ivana ;
Howard, Helen ;
Marshall, Helen ;
McCabe, Christopher ;
Pavitt, Sue ;
Quirke, Phil ;
Rivers, Carly S. ;
Brown, Julia M. B. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 27 (02) :233-241
[26]   Learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: use of the cumulative sum method [J].
Tomohiro Yamaguchi ;
Yusuke Kinugasa ;
Akio Shiomi ;
Sumito Sato ;
Yushi Yamakawa ;
Hiroyasu Kagawa ;
Hiroyuki Tomioka ;
Keita Mori .
Surgical Endoscopy, 2015, 29 :1679-1685
[27]   Application of the advance incision in robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal anterior resection [J].
Qiu, Yuhao ;
Li, Ying ;
Chen, Zhenzhou ;
Chai, Ninghui ;
Liang, Xianping ;
Zhang, Dahong ;
Wei, Zhengqiang .
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 10
[28]   Preoperative Indocyanine Green Tattooing for Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Rectal Cancer [J].
Morimoto, Yoshihiro ;
Kobayashi, Akihiro ;
Yamazaki, Nobuyoshi ;
Kubo, Kouichirou ;
Satou, Manabu ;
Kobayashi, Ryousuke ;
Asai, Daichi ;
Akamine, Kouta ;
Ogata, Kenji .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2025, 18 (01)
[29]   Comparison of complication and conversion rates between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer: which patients and providers could benefit most from robotic-assisted surgery? [J].
Ackerman, Stacey J. ;
Daniel, Shoshana ;
Baik, Rebecca ;
Liu, Emelline ;
Mehendale, Shilpa ;
Tackett, Scott ;
Hellan, Minia .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 21 (03) :254-261
[30]   Open versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better? [J].
Wilson, Timothy ;
Torrey, Robert .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2011, 21 (03) :200-205